Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    nyc.politics    |    Politics specific to New York City    |    92,003 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 90,180 of 92,003    |
|    Felcher Adam Schiff to All    |
|    Mark Penn: Green New Deal has more in co    |
|    11 Feb 19 01:12:18    |
      XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sac.politics       XPost: alt.gossip.celebrities       From: felcher.adam.schiff@sacbee.com              The “Green New Deal” is not green at all. If anything it’s a       raw, red deal. It calls for a government takeover of our wage,       and of our energy, housing, health care and transportation       sectors. It has more in common with Mao’s Cultural Revolution       than it does FDR’s New Deal, which lifted millions out of the       Great Depression.              Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez announced this resolution       with Massachusetts Democratic Sen. Ed Marky and a bevy of       supporting congressmen.              One wonders if anyone actually read it.              One section says that in the spirit of democracy that only       people from “frontline and vulnerable communities and workers”       will “plan, run and administer” all of these massive green deal       programs.              Just as Mao’s Cultural Revolution empowered students over their       parents, so this bill sets up identity politics groups as having       power over the major sectors of the economy. It even calls for a       national “mobilization, “as Mao did.              Referencing historical discrimination, this bill in effect does       away with one person one vote, or democracy as we know it, since       in this resolution, redress of the past requires that only these       designated groups would have a say in running this plan, whose       administration would in effect be the domestic policy of the       country.              Even more puzzling is that six Democratic candidates for       president have given support to this effort. Most Americans       oppose even a modest increase in the gasoline tax, let alone       virtual destruction of the oil, natural gas and coal industries.       That’s a $136 billion dollar industry employing about 10 million       people. After mandating the “100 percent” end of these       industries as part of the mobilization, the resolution calls for       a guaranteed job for all Americans and economic security even       for those “unwilling” to work.              It mandates that every building in America will be upgraded.       It’s unclear in this legislative framework who would pay for       incalculable costs of such a program because no one could ever       possibly pay for it. No tax on the rich would ever generate       enough to first eliminate our energy industry, including clean       natural gas, replace it with technologies that are not yet ready       and then provide a guaranteed job for everyone, with full       benefits, regardless of employability. Don’t worry, though, “low       tech” solutions to remove carbon dioxide will be encouraged.              The demand for justice on the basis of climate change is upside       down. The energy revolution did not cause the oppression of the       frontline and vulnerable communities. Quite the opposite, it was       at the core of the democratization of technology as Thomas       Edison’s invention of the light bulb was not limited to the few       but became universal to every household.              The moderately priced car created by Henry Ford helped create       the middle class and later provided the near-universal mobility       that enabled people to live in the suburbs and commute to work.       While the oil industry was broken up to create greater       competition, these energy driven inventions were at the center       of transforming American life for everyone.              Air travel is out under this deal as well, to be replaced by       high-speed trains. Yea. Right. Amtrak to California.              The very premise that America is the carbon fiend that needs to       mobilize to this degree on its own is faulty as well. Carbon       emissions from America have been declining, down 2.7 percent in       2016. Since 2011, carbon emissions from large power plants in       the U.S. have declined by nearly 20 percent.              The two most populous countries on earth -- India and China --       both looking to move more and more millions of people to the       middle class, are ground zero for the explosion of future carbon       emissions. We need to develop affordable energy technologies       that could be deployed to bring these developing countries into       line.              This plan is really a nifty piece of marketing to use the       environment as a Trojan horse to justify socialism in America.       It is not a serious plan to deal with the global issue of       climate change in the world. Rather than advance the cause of       climate change, this legislation could prove more of an easy       target for Republicans to discredit the Democrats, who just won       over moderate suburban voters in the last election. While many       in polls may support something called the “green deal,” few       Americans will support the details of this legislation once       examined and explained.              It’s not the platform of the Democratic Party and it’s up to the       leadership of the party to back realistic proposals for a better              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca