XPost: alt.politics.trump, alt.society.mental-health, misc.legal   
   XPost: talk.politics.guns   
   From: lynching@nyc.gov   
      
   by Jonathan Turley   
      
   Below is my column in the New York Post on the meltdown of Michael Cohen   
   on the stand in the Manhattan trial of former President Donald Trump.  In   
   a trial careening out of control, Judge Juan Merchan seemed to be   
   furiously working to just get the matter to the jury as fast as possible.   
   Judge Merchan seems in open denial of the legal farce playing out in his   
   courtroom. He is only the latest person pulled into the vortex of the   
   swirling corruption around Michael Cohen.   
      
   Here is the column:   
      
   The completion of the testimony of Michael Cohen left the prosecution of   
   Donald Trump, like its star witness, in tatters.   
      
   In the final day of cross-examination, Cohen admitted to committing   
   larceny in stealing tens of thousands of dollars from his client.   
      
   Even more notably, he admitted to the larceny on the stand — after the   
   statute of limitations had passed. There will be no dead felony zapped   
   back into life against Cohen, as it was for Trump.   
      
   Cohen clearly has found a home for his unique skill as a convicted,   
   disbarred serial perjurer.   
      
   It was not the first time that prosecutors looked the other way as Cohen   
   admitted to major criminal conduct: In a prior hearing, Cohen admitted   
   under oath that he lied in a previous case where he pleaded guilty to   
   lying.   
      
   If that is a bit confusing, it was just another day in the life of Michael   
   Cohen, who appears only willing to tell the truth if he has no other   
   alternative.   
      
   The result is truly otherworldly. You have a disbarred lawyer not only   
   casually discussing lies and uncharged crimes, but prosecutors who   
   proceeded to get him to remind the jury that he is not facing any further   
   criminal charges.   
      
   If any one of those jurors had stolen tens of thousands of dollars, they   
   would be given a fast trip to the hoosegow.   
      
   Yet Cohen then matter-of-factly said he plans to run for Congress due to   
   his “name recognition” — the ultimate proof that it does not matter   
   whether you are famous or infamous, so long as they spell your name right.   
      
   As a legislator, Cohen would have the unique ability to say he will not be   
   corrupted by Congress — because he came to Congress corrupted.   
      
   While most members wait to take office to commit felonies, Rep. Cohen   
   would show up with a self-affirming criminal record.   
      
   He could then take one of the few oaths that he has not previously   
   violated as the Honorable Rep. Michael Cohen.   
      
   At the end of the day, Cohen is the ultimate shining object for   
   prosecutors to use as a distraction from the glaring omissions in their   
   case.   
      
   Prior witnesses testified that Trump’s payments to Cohen were  designated   
   as “legal expenses” not by Trump but by his accounting staff.   
      
   Moreover, Cohen admitted that he worked for Trump for years in his murky   
   capacity as a fixer. References to payments as a retainer were approved by   
   Allen Weisselberg, a retired executive with the Trump Organization.   
      
   The “legal expense” label was a natural characterization for a lawyer who   
   was paid monthly and was on-call as Trump’s personal counsel.   
      
   In any other district, this case would never have been allowed in trial.   
   It certainly now should be facing a directed verdict by the court.   
      
   Indeed, with any other defendant, a New York jury would be giving a Bronx   
   cheer in derision.   
      
   Even CNN hosts and experts have admitted that this case would never have   
   been brought against another defendant or in another district.   
      
   That is what Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg is counting on.   
      
   The biggest problem facing the defense is not the evidence, but the judge:   
   Judge Juan Merchan seems to be channeling George Patton’s warning, “May   
   God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won’t.”   
      
   https://floppingaces.net/most-wanted/are-you-staring-me-down-judge-   
   merchan-becomes-an-oddity-in-his-own-courtroom/   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)