XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.guns, sac.politics   
   XPost: misc.immigration.usa, or.politics   
   From: bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com   
      
   Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> wrote in   
   news:665e5e13$0$3102243$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:   
      
   > On 2024-06-03, Baxter  wrote:   
   >> pothead  wrote in   
   >> news:v3kudf$3vun9$5@dont-email.me:   
   >>   
   >>> On 2024-06-03, Putin Can Nuke New York State Now   
   >>>  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>> That should make the libby's heads spin like tops.   
   >>>   
   >>> Biden, the democrats and the weaponized DOJ have let Pandora out of   
   >>> her box and it's ultimately going to cost them the presidency and   
   >>> possibly the senate. People on both sides of the aisle are angry at   
   >>> seeing a weaponized justice system and they are reacting.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> tRump flat-out said he intends to weaponize the DOJ against everybody   
   >> he doesn't like.  And you support this?!!   
   >   
   > Under normal conditions, no, I do NOT support this.   
   > However Biden and the democrats have started it so everything and   
   > anything is on the table. What's good for the goose, is good for the   
   > gander.   
      
   NO! even if it were true that Biden weaponized the DOJ, your mission   
   would be to fix it so it could never happen again - not become the the   
   evil you oppose.   
      
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >> You have NO evidence that Biden weaponized the DOJ - especially since   
   >> the DOJ is going after his son.   
   >   
   > ROTFLMAO!!!!   
   > Letticia James, Fanni and others meeting with Joe Biden.   
      
   Proof?   
      
   > A DOJ rising superstar, 3 from the top just happens to abandon his   
   > career to become an ADA in NYC.   
      
   People change jobs all the time. Given he started in NY, that's more   
   likely where his loyalties lie   
      
   >Charges over 7 years old which were   
   > denied by the FEC, DOJ and even Bragg himself all of a sudden become   
   > relevant a couple of weeks after Trump declares his candidacy.   
      
   There wasn't enough solid evidence back then, but various trials exposed   
   more evidence.   
      
   >The   
   > judge appointed just happens to be the same judge who presided over   
   > other Trump associate trials.   
   > And there are many more tells.   
   >   
   > Either you are brainwashed or a complete idiot to believe otherwise.   
   >   
   12 ordinary citizens heard both sides and rendered a verdict. That's the   
   only fact that matters.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)