XPost: alt.politics.liberalism, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.guns   
   XPost: sac.politics   
   From: KeithLibertarian@webtv.net   
      
   NEW YORK CITY (WABC) -- The implementation of congestion pricing in New   
   York City has been indefinitely postponed. It will not start on June 30 as   
   originally planned, Gov. Kathy Hochul announced Wednesday.   
      
   The move marks a stunning reversal for public transit advocates who had   
   championed the tolls as a way of raising billions of dollars for New   
   York's beleaguered subway and commuter rail systems while reducing traffic   
   in the city's streets.   
      
   Hochul said that while she remains committed to the program's   
   environmental goals, implementing it now as New York City is still   
   recovering from the COVID-19 pandemic "risked too many unintended   
   consequences for New Yorkers at this time."   
      
   The tolling program had been scheduled to start June 30.   
      
   The governor framed her decision as economic, saying the city's recovery   
   from the pandemic is incomplete and "hard-working New Yorkers are getting   
   hammered on costs" for food, housing and childcare.   
      
   The governor expressed concern suburban commuters would choose to work   
   from home or skip recreational visits to the city. She said nothing about   
   politics, which undoubtedly played a role in her decision to instruct the   
   MTA to indefinitely pause implementation of congestion pricing.   
      
   "We remain fully committed to advancing all the improvements New Yorkers   
   have been promised," including track and signal repairs, security cameras   
   and the extension of the 2nd Av. subway line. She said the state had   
   already set aside funding for the MTA in case congestion pricing was held   
   up by the courts.   
      
   New York would have become the first U.S. city to join a handful globally   
   with similar congestion pricing schemes, including London, Stockholm,   
   Milan and Singapore, which is credited with pioneering the first such   
   program in 1975.   
      
   Most people driving passenger vehicles into Manhattan below 60th Street -   
   roughly the area south of Central Park - would have to pay at least $15   
   under the system, with larger vehicles paying more. Those tolls would come   
   on top of the already hefty tolls for using bridges and tunnels to enter   
   Manhattan, like the $13.38 to $17.63 it costs to take a car through the   
   Lincoln or Holland tunnels.   
      
   The MTA has already invested tens of millions of dollars installing   
   cameras, sensors, license plate readers and other equipment on city   
   roadways in anticipation of the plan's launch. The fee was expected to   
   provide an annual cash infusion of around $1 billion for subway and bus   
   systems that carry some 4 million riders daily.   
      
   The decision to delay also comes as Democrats are facing difficult House   
   races in the New York City suburbs. Republicans have planned to use   
   congestion pricing as a political wedge.   
      
   Congressman Mike Lawler, a Republican representing part of the Hudson   
   Valley, wasted no time in weighing in on the governor's decision.   
      
   "I think it's a great step in the right direction," said Mayor Mark   
   Sokolich, (D) Fort Lee. "We're not in Fort Lee trying to get the MTA to   
   not operate properly we're just trying to make sure there's fairness in   
   the process."   
      
   Sokolich said Fort Lee would have had to cope with a 25% traffic increase   
   throughout their area which would have negatively impacted the air   
   quality.   
      
   New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy said in part, "Although we have had a   
   difference of opinion with our colleagues in New York on congestion   
   pricing implementation, we have always had a shared vision for growing our   
   regional economy, investing in infrastructure, protecting our environment,   
   and creating good-paying jobs on both sides of the Hudson River. We fully   
   embrace the notion that the success of Manhattan is inextricably linked to   
   the prosperity of the entire Tri-State Area. Governor Hochul and Mayor   
   Adams have been strong, collaborative governing partners and I look   
   forward to continuing to work closely with them for the benefit of all of   
   our residents."   
      
   ALSO READ: NJ reaction to postponement of congestion pricing   
   On the flip side, Sam Schwartz, a transportation expert called the   
   decision by the governor, disappointing.   
      
   "I'm very disappointed, I thought the governor had a lot of courage to   
   proceed even though it was another governor that recommended it. I'm   
   disappointed by her saying the timing isn't now, the timing is now," he   
   said. "The reality is that the transit system will suffer."   
      
   The MTA, which would potentially face a $1 billion budget deficit without   
   implementation, declined to comment.   
      
   Members of the MTA board, which oversees the transit agency, said they had   
   not been briefed on the delay.   
      
   "I'm in shock," said Andrew Albert, a member of the board. "We won't get   
   new buses, new subway cars, new signals. It's a betrayal of the millions   
   and millions of people who would have been helped by this."   
      
   John Samuelsen, President of the Transport Workers Union of America, said   
   Hochul was warned about moving forward with the plan without having   
   "massive service improvements" already in place.   
      
   "This was the moment in time to do it. This is the moment in time to green   
   New York City, to increase public transit, to change commuter behavior and   
   she blew it! They flushed the moment down the toilet. They flushed the   
   moment down the toilet by not improving service for working people,"   
   Samuelsen said.   
      
   Hochul had been a vocal supporter of the plan, which was signed into law   
   by her predecessor, Gov. Andrew Cuomo, in 2019.   
      
   New York City Mayor Eric Adams said Wednesday that he would support the   
   governor's decision to reassess. "If she's looking at what others we can   
   do it and how we can do it correctly, I'm all for it," he said. "This is a   
   major shift for our city and it has to be done correctly."   
      
   There were several lawsuits filed against congestion pricing, and one   
   official on Staten Island said they are waiting for a final decision by   
   the state before deciding what to do with their lawsuit.   
      
   "It's a little premature to make that decision because we don't know   
   what's going to come out of the state, once the state makes its official   
   position, then we'll decide what to do with the litigation," said Vito   
   Fossella, Staten Island Borough President.   
      
   On Long Island, Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman said that the   
   governor couldn't deny that the plan was a bad idea for the whole   
   metropolitan area coming out of the pandemic.   
      
   "I'm very grateful that the sole vote against this on the MTA was our   
   representative," Blakeman said. "I just hope that the governor isn't   
   contemplating a commuter tax on the suburbs."   
      
   There remains a belief that congestion pricing is inevitable. The plan   
   would charge a $15 toll for passenger cars driving south of 60th Street   
   from 5 a.m. to 9 p.m. on weekdays. There are certain exceptions. Several   
   lawsuits are challenging the plan.   
      
   https://abc7ny.com/post/congestion-pricing-nyc-kathy-hochul-start-   
   delay/14912968/   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)