Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    nyc.politics    |    Politics specific to New York City    |    92,004 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 92,004 of 92,004    |
|    Pelosi Goes To prison to All    |
|    Supreme court hands Republicans win over    |
|    03 Mar 26 09:01:53    |
      XPost: alt.politics.elections, alt.politics.republicans, sac.politics       XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.guns       From: noreply@mixmin.net              The supreme court on Monday sided with Republicans in ruling that the       boundaries of the only GOP-held congressional district in New York City       do not need to be redrawn for the 2026 elections, despite a court ruling       that the district is unfair to Black and Hispanic residents.              Over the dissent of the court’s three liberal justices, the conservative       majority halted the state court ruling that had ordered New York’s       redistricting commission to redraw the district held by Nicole       Malliotakis that covers Staten Island and a small piece of Brooklyn.              The outcome is a victory for Republicans in a national tug-of-war over       redistricting that could determine control of the closely divided House       of Representatives. Republicans currently hold a razor-thin majority.              New York Republicans and the Trump administration had sought the high       court’s intervention. Qualifying for congressional elections in New York       began last week.              A judge had ruled that the district was drawn in a way that dilutes the       power of its Black and Hispanic voters and had ordered the state’s       independent redistricting commission to complete a new map.              The court did not explain its rationale, as is typical in emergency       appeals. But Justice Samuel Alito wrote the judge’s ruling under New       York’s constitution amounted to “unadorned racial discrimination” in       violation of the US constitution.              Justice Sonia Sotomayor objected to the supreme court’s decision to step       into the case now, though she did not defend the ruling that has been       challenged.              “Time and again, this Court has said that federal courts should not       meddle with state election laws ahead of an election ... Ignoring every       limit on federal courts’ authority, the Court takes the unprecedented       step of staying a state trial court’s decision in a redistricting       dispute on matters of state law without giving the State’s highest court       a chance to act,” Sotomayor wrote, joined by her two liberal colleagues.              Ed Cox, the New York state Republican chair, praised the order and       criticized Kathy Hochul, the governor, and other Democratic leaders for       allowing the case to proceed.              The dispute in New York is part of the redistricting battle that was       spurred by Donald Trump when he urged Republicans in Texas to redraw the       state’s congressional districts for political gain. Democrats countered       with their own gerrymandering in California. More states soon followed.              The supreme court has allowed the new maps in California and Texas to be       used in this year’s elections, even as court challenges continue.              https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/mar/02/supreme-court-new-york-ci       ty-republican-district              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca