Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    nyc.transit    |    Advice on getting mugged on the subways    |    3,014 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,207 of 3,014    |
|    hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com to Joseph D. Korman    |
|    Re: G line study    |
|    12 Dec 14 11:18:38    |
      On Friday, December 12, 2014 1:27:58 PM UTC-5, Joseph D. Korman wrote:       > The thing missing was a plan to increase the train lengths to six 75'        > cars (450'). But the only way that could be done is to undo some of the        > four car units of R-68 or R-68A cars into pairs. Most were unitized        > into four car sets making trains either 300' or 600'. The exception are        > the few that were left as singles for the Franklin shuttle.              According to the report detail, there are absolutely no plans to increase       train length as the trains have sufficient capacity as is. Adding capacity       would be a waste of money they don't have.              The report gave the layouts of every station, which in itself is interesting       since I don't think that kind of thing is published very often, if at all.        You mention entrance closings, and I wonder if any such closings force       passengers to double back to        reach the location of the train (I'd have to study each station layout plus       know neighborhood patterns).              Was the GG ever a real heavy hauler, such as back in the days of WW II when       there was more industry along its corridor?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca