Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    nyc.transit    |    Advice on getting mugged on the subways    |    3,014 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,321 of 3,014    |
|    hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com to danny burstein    |
|    Re: regarding "amtrak" vs. "amtrack"    |
|    10 May 15 20:05:42    |
      On Sunday, May 10, 2015 at 5:51:08 PM UTC-4, danny burstein wrote:       > I have this nagging memory that back in 1971,       > when the National Railroad Passenger Administration       > was considering a new name, they considered       > using "Amtrack" (with the "c") before they       > settled on "Amtrak".              In early Amtrak literature and New York Times articles it was "Amtrak."              Prior to that it was gonna be called Railpax.                     > I seem to recall someone or another actually       > finding official documents with the longer       > name from that time and ref'ing them here       > or in another train oriented group.              Never seen any literature or heard any reference to "Amtrack".              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca