Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    nyc.transit    |    Advice on getting mugged on the subways    |    3,014 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,323 of 3,014    |
|    danny burstein to All    |
|    regarding "amtrak" vs. "amtrack"    |
|    10 May 15 21:51:07    |
      XPost: misc.transport.rail.americas       From: dannyb@panix.com              I have this nagging memory that back in 1971,       when the National Railroad Passenger Administration       was considering a new name, they considered       using "Amtrack" (with the "c") before they       settled on "Amtrak".              I seem to recall someone or another actually       finding official documents with the longer       name from that time and ref'ing them here       or in another train oriented group.              Obviously if there was any such proposal it       didn't last very long..              Does this jog anyone's memory?              Thanks muchly                     --       _____________________________________________________       Knowledge may be power, but communications is the key        dannyb@panix.com       [to foil spammers, my address has been double rot-13 encoded]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca