home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   nyc.transit      Advice on getting mugged on the subways      3,014 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 1,331 of 3,014   
   hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com to Thor Lancelot Simon   
   Re: regarding "amtrak" vs. "amtrack"   
   11 May 15 09:44:39   
   
   On Monday, May 11, 2015 at 10:20:31 AM UTC-4, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:   
   > >In early Amtrak literature and New York Times articles it was "Amtrak."   
   >   
   > Depends how early.  They actually got far enough to label some equipment   
   > as "Amtrack"; I've got pictures around somewhere of either a Turbo or   
   > Metroliner coach in "Amtrack" livery.  I'll dig.   
      
   The earliest reference to "Amtrak"--searching back to the beginning--was an   
   article of 4/20/1971, stating that "Amtrak" would replace "Railpax" and the   
   deployment of the arrow logo.   
      
   There was a reference to an "amtrak", a 35 ton military amphibious vehicle in   
   Vietnam, but that isn't relevant to our purposes.   
      
   The only references to "Amtrack" in the NYT were to a WW II military   
   amphibious vehicle.   
      
   So, it would appear that "Amtrack" was never used for passenger train   
   service.  Originally it was called Railpax, and that evolved directly into   
   Amtrak.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca