Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    nyc.transit    |    Advice on getting mugged on the subways    |    3,014 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,331 of 3,014    |
|    hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com to Thor Lancelot Simon    |
|    Re: regarding "amtrak" vs. "amtrack"    |
|    11 May 15 09:44:39    |
      On Monday, May 11, 2015 at 10:20:31 AM UTC-4, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:       > >In early Amtrak literature and New York Times articles it was "Amtrak."       >       > Depends how early. They actually got far enough to label some equipment       > as "Amtrack"; I've got pictures around somewhere of either a Turbo or       > Metroliner coach in "Amtrack" livery. I'll dig.              The earliest reference to "Amtrak"--searching back to the beginning--was an       article of 4/20/1971, stating that "Amtrak" would replace "Railpax" and the       deployment of the arrow logo.              There was a reference to an "amtrak", a 35 ton military amphibious vehicle in       Vietnam, but that isn't relevant to our purposes.              The only references to "Amtrack" in the NYT were to a WW II military       amphibious vehicle.              So, it would appear that "Amtrack" was never used for passenger train       service. Originally it was called Railpax, and that evolved directly into       Amtrak.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca