home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   nyc.transit      Advice on getting mugged on the subways      3,014 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 1,539 of 3,014   
   John Levine to All   
   Re: LRVs not, was Port Authority Bus Ter   
   30 Sep 15 15:03:03   
   
   From: johnl@iecc.com   
      
   > crowding down a lot with rail. HBLR via the Lincoln   
   > Tunnel would be cheap if the vehicles fit.   
      
   I've been looking at pictures of the HBLR equipment, and I don't see   
   any way you could fit them in the tunnel.  The cars are 12.27' high   
   and the tunnel's only 13" high.  You can't fit a catenary system in   
   eight inches of clearance.  I doubt you could even squash the   
   pantographs that flat.   
      
   Also, the current width limit is 8.5' and the LRVs are 8.79'.   
      
   While poking around I found some engineering papers that say there's a   
   (totally unfunded of course) plan to extend the HBLR to Secaucus Jct.   
   Flushing Line extension, anyone?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca