Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    nyc.transit    |    Advice on getting mugged on the subways    |    3,014 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,539 of 3,014    |
|    John Levine to All    |
|    Re: LRVs not, was Port Authority Bus Ter    |
|    30 Sep 15 15:03:03    |
      From: johnl@iecc.com              > crowding down a lot with rail. HBLR via the Lincoln       > Tunnel would be cheap if the vehicles fit.              I've been looking at pictures of the HBLR equipment, and I don't see       any way you could fit them in the tunnel. The cars are 12.27' high       and the tunnel's only 13" high. You can't fit a catenary system in       eight inches of clearance. I doubt you could even squash the       pantographs that flat.              Also, the current width limit is 8.5' and the LRVs are 8.79'.              While poking around I found some engineering papers that say there's a       (totally unfunded of course) plan to extend the HBLR to Secaucus Jct.       Flushing Line extension, anyone?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca