Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    nyc.transit    |    Advice on getting mugged on the subways    |    3,014 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,969 of 3,014    |
|    hounslow3@yahoo.co.uk to hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com    |
|    Re: EMD FL-9    |
|    01 Apr 17 21:51:53    |
      On 31.03.17 1:34, hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com wrote:       > On Tuesday, March 28, 2017 at 7:10:18 PM UTC-4, houn...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:       >> Did FL-9s normally run under their own power or on the 3rd rail in the       >> Park Avenue tunnel?       >       > They were supposed to run on 3rd rail while in the tunnels and terminal.       > However, as they aged, this didn't work so well, and sometimes they had       > to use diesel. GCT stunk from the fumes when that happened.       >       > In the dark days of the 1980s, they may have been forced to use       > a straight diesel at times.              It seemed to have been all the time, IIRC.              I had a cab ride on an FL-9 from GCT, BTW; The engineer spooled up from       the engine room when the train was in the bay track and departed from       there completely on diesel.              Assuming that FL-9s did at one point run on electricity into and out of       GCT, how did they switch modes when they exited the portal? There was no       other way to spool up except in the engine room, so did the fireman go       back do it on the fly or did the train have to come to full stop at some       place like 125th Street?              > The opening of the upper Harlem Line electrification and new MU cars       > alleviated the situation quite a bit,              The cab ride that I had was well after they completed electrification.              > as did rehab of the FL9's.              Was that the ACFL-9 or F-10? I heard that they were extremely       problematic, and that they normally had to have a technician ride along       in the cab in the more-than-likely event that something would go wrong.              Essentially, that was the EMD equivalent to the SPV-2000.              The one advantage that I imagine that the rebuilt models had was that       the engineer could spool up from the cab.              > Ironically, when new, the FL9's had a lot of teething pains for       > what should've been pretty basic technology. Despite that, they       > ended up staying in service for nearly 50 years, very long for       > a diesel locomotive.              They were an icon. Shame about the Hancock whistles, however -- their       replacement by the F-note horns kind of heralded the FL-9s' end, IMHO.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca