XPost: alt.atheism, alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic, talk.politics.guns   
   XPost: sac.politics   
   From: klausschadenfreude@null.net   
      
   On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 20:05:36 -0500, "Scout"   
    wrote:   
      
   >   
   >   
   > wrote in message   
   >news:m0r03ddm4e8vv5fsujd1m597rr0jtugltu@4ax.com...   
   >> On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 18:09:21 -0500, "Scout"   
   >>  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>"Teresita"  wrote in message   
   >>>news:p0of6d02v7d@news4.newsguy.com...   
   >>>> On 12/12/2017 03:34 AM, bilgat@m.nu wrote:   
   >>>>> And lastly the fact that she said the word if just goes to show that   
   >>>>> any theist is a fucking idiot and a trashy liar that will say anything   
   >>>>> or do anything (including lying) just to show that a god exists.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> No one has shown tangible evidence that a god exists, ever.   
   >>>   
   >>>Can you define exactly what such tangible evidence would be?   
   >>>   
   >>>Note: It has to exist independent of such a God having to prove he exists.   
   >>>   
   >>>Does a swallow need to prove to you it exists?   
   >>>   
   >>>Does a rock?   
   >>>   
   >>>Do you even know what it is you would be looking for?   
   >>   
   >> Well first your god does not have to prove it exists,   
   >   
   >First mistake, I have no gods. I'm here merely as a mildly interested   
   >neutral party.   
   >   
   >>You do.   
   >   
   >No, I don't because I've not made any claims that god(s) do or do not exist.   
   >   
   >   
   >> Can a theist prove they exist?   
   >   
   >You would have to ask one.   
   >   
   >Of course the flip side of that question is can a antitheist prove they do   
   >not exist?   
   >   
   >   
   >> I doubt it they are about as   
   >> intelligent as that swallow you mentioned or perhaps even that rock   
   >> you mentioned.   
   >   
   >Which would make them about as intelligent as antitheists.   
   >   
   >>   
   >> But as I said your god/fairy does not have to prove anything you do.   
   >   
   >and the merry-go-round winds back to the start.   
   >   
   >I'll get off now.   
   >   
   >Try again when you have something of interest to say.   
   >   
      
   Why didn't God give atheists the ability to read?   
      
   [chuckle]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)