XPost: alt.atheism, alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic, talk.politics.guns   
   XPost: sac.politics   
   From: me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net   
      
    wrote in message   
   news:i7113d14t45kj2addl7rmur1j0m9ippo9q@4ax.com...   
   > On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 20:05:36 -0500, "Scout"   
   >  wrote:   
   >   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> wrote in message   
   >>news:m0r03ddm4e8vv5fsujd1m597rr0jtugltu@4ax.com...   
   >>> On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 18:09:21 -0500, "Scout"   
   >>>  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>"Teresita"  wrote in message   
   >>>>news:p0of6d02v7d@news4.newsguy.com...   
   >>>>> On 12/12/2017 03:34 AM, bilgat@m.nu wrote:   
   >>>>>> And lastly the fact that she said the word if just goes to show that   
   >>>>>> any theist is a fucking idiot and a trashy liar that will say   
   >>>>>> anything   
   >>>>>> or do anything (including lying) just to show that a god exists.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> No one has shown tangible evidence that a god exists, ever.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Can you define exactly what such tangible evidence would be?   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Note: It has to exist independent of such a God having to prove he   
   >>>>exists.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Does a swallow need to prove to you it exists?   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Does a rock?   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Do you even know what it is you would be looking for?   
   >>>   
   >>> Well first your god does not have to prove it exists,   
   >>   
   >>First mistake, I have no gods. I'm here merely as a mildly interested   
   >>neutral party.   
   >>   
   >>>You do.   
   >>   
   >>No, I don't because I've not made any claims that god(s) do or do not   
   >>exist.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>> Can a theist prove they exist?   
   >>   
   >>You would have to ask one.   
   >>   
   >>Of course the flip side of that question is can a antitheist prove they do   
   >>not exist   
   >   
   >   
   > do you know what an anti theist is? because I am one.   
   > and proving that I don't exist is an invalid question. it is a null   
   > set. the same as try ng to divide by zero   
      
   Fine, the you're asserting to have proof that gods don't exist.   
      
   Please present your proof and let's see if it stands up to the same   
   standards you seem to demand of the other side.   
      
      
   >   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>> I doubt it they are about as   
   >>> intelligent as that swallow you mentioned or perhaps even that rock   
   >>> you mentioned.   
   >>   
   >>Which would make them about as intelligent as antitheists.   
   >   
   > Anti theists are the most intelligent of the bunch. read Christopher   
   > Hitchens   
      
   No, actually that would be the agnostics who identify, accept and   
   acknowledge that we lack the knowledge to make a determination in either   
   direction.   
      
   Your position is little different than that of theists in that your position   
   is one of faith rather than fact.   
      
   >>> But as I said your god/fairy does not have to prove anything you do.   
   >>   
   >>and the merry-go-round winds back to the start.   
   >>   
   >>I'll get off now.   
   >>   
   >>Try again when you have something of interest to say.   
   >>   
      
   I accept your total and utterly inability to answer the questions put to you   
   or address the points being made.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)