XPost: alt.atheism, alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic, talk.politics.guns   
   XPost: sac.politics   
   From: me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net   
      
    wrote in message   
   news:tnp83d5iek49cnbvumgh2kqmg42c9bdf62@4ax.com...   
   > On Fri, 15 Dec 2017 15:26:57 -0500, "Scout"   
   >  wrote:   
   >   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>"Teresita"  wrote in message   
   >>news:p0sp911m9e@news3.newsguy.com...   
   >>> On 12/12/2017 03:09 PM, Scout wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> "Teresita"  wrote in message   
   >>>> news:p0of6d02v7d@news4.newsguy.com...   
   >>>>> On 12/12/2017 03:34 AM, bilgat@m.nu wrote:   
   >>>>>> And lastly the fact that she said the word if just goes to show that   
   >>>>>> any theist is a fucking idiot and a trashy liar that will say   
   >>>>>> anything   
   >>>>>> or do anything (including lying) just to show that a god exists.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> No one has shown tangible evidence that a god exists, ever.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Can you define exactly what such tangible evidence would be?   
   >>>   
   >>> Force carriers for spirit particles manifested in a CERN cloud chamber,   
   >>> ala the other god particle, also known by the name of Higgs.   
   >>   
   >>And perhaps they are indeed bits of god....but then again, so could the   
   >>entire Universe.   
   >>   
   >>After all, but the Bible and Science agree on one thing at the beginning   
   >>of   
   >>everything......there was nothing other than God...or the primordial   
   >>singularity.  If we assume they both describe the same thing...then the   
   >   
   > That is in no way an agreement on anything. Wow you really hit a home   
   > run there...   
      
   So which of this do you claim is wrong? The Bible or Science?   
      
      
      
   >>Universe itself would be the evidence.....if only we had the knowledge to   
   >>recognize it. However, without such knowledge no one can really say   
   >>whether   
   >>such physical evidence exists or doesn't exist, and I've not yet found   
   >>anyone able to show otherwise.......on either side.   
   >   
   > There is no either side.   
      
   Theists vs Antitheists.   
      
   2 sides....as denoted by the "anti"   
      
   > That is what you seem to be missing out on. Theists say god exists.   
      
   And Antitheist says god(s) do not exist.   
      
      
   > THEY and only they are responsible for showing that fairies are real.   
      
   And you are responsible for showing they aren't.   
      
      
   > Atheists just sit back and laugh at the fools for believing in   
   > fairies. Atheists do not need to prove there is no god UNTIL theists   
   > show that there is a god.   
      
   I see, so you feel your faith doesn't need to prove anything but their faith   
   has to prove everything?   
      
   Seems rather one sided, since you assert a positive position and thus have   
   your own obligation to support that position.   
      
   Oh, and I would note that lack of evidence does not prove lack of existence.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)