XPost: alt.atheism, alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic, talk.politics.guns
XPost: sac.politics
From: me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net
wrote in message
news:0k2s3dp19ehvmncd1clduh155aaupslsji@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 23 Dec 2017 00:27:17 -0500, "Scout"
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> wrote in message
>>news:c0or3d9i682a49igsjncfektk6enbo26ea@4ax.com...
>>> On Fri, 22 Dec 2017 20:58:19 -0500, "Scout"
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> wrote in message
>>>>news:tnp83d5iek49cnbvumgh2kqmg42c9bdf62@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Fri, 15 Dec 2017 15:26:57 -0500, "Scout"
>>>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>And perhaps they are indeed bits of god....but then again, so could
>>>>>>the
>>>>>>entire Universe.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>After all, but the Bible and Science agree on one thing at the
>>>>>>beginning
>>>>>>of
>>>>>>everything......there was nothing other than God...or the primordial
>>>>>>singularity. If we assume they both describe the same thing...then
>>>>>>the
>>>>>
>>>>> That is in no way an agreement on anything. Wow you really hit a home
>>>>> run there...
>>>>
>>>>So which of this do you claim is wrong? The Bible or Science?
>>>
>>> I am making no claims, because science and religion do not agree on
>>> anything, which is what I said previously but I guess you did not
>>> quite catch that part even though I said
>>
>>
>>What they both agree on is that there was nothing in the entire universe
>>except for one body, by whatever name you chose to call it.
>
> Where are you getting this shit from? do you just bend over and pull
> it out of your ass? You truly have no idea what the hell you are
> talking about. But as soon as you finish high school and learn some
> basic science then comeback and we may be able to talk
>>
>>It's merely your contention that they don't agree. For all you know the
>>primordial singularity of science and God of the bible are one and the
>>same.
>
>
> No, just no.
Why?
Because your FAITH says otherwise?
>>I know, you will immediately dismiss the idea because it's not something
>>your faith would allow you to consider.
>
>
> You are really a moron I will no longer respond to you
And when he can't refute this rational proposal he simply runs away because
other than his faith he's got nothing.
>>>>>That is in no way an agreement on anything
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>Universe itself would be the evidence.....if only we had the knowledge
>>>>>>to
>>>>>>recognize it. However, without such knowledge no one can really say
>>>>>>whether
>>>>>>such physical evidence exists or doesn't exist, and I've not yet found
>>>>>>anyone able to show otherwise.......on either side.
>>>>>
>>>>> There is no either side.
>>>>
>>>>Theists vs Antitheists.
>>>>
>>>>2 sides....as denoted by the "anti"
>>>
>>>
>>> You are obviously one of those people who always must have conflict,
>>
>>That's what "anti" means. An opposing force, energy, view, etc.
>>
>>
>>> does that make you a barbarian? Perhaps a Neanderthal? Or just a less
>>> evolved homo sapiens? Either way There are no two sides, this is not a
>>> game and we are not at war. Seriously WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH YOU?
>>
>>So you don't understand the English language?
>>
>>>>> That is what you seem to be missing out on. Theists say god exists.
>>>>
>>>>And Antitheist says god(s) do not exist.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> THEY and only they are responsible for showing that fairies are real.
>>>>
>>>>And you are responsible for showing they aren't.
>>>
>>> Lame, really lame. Yet you would be correct, I am responsible for
>>> showing that there are no gods, so as soon as you can show that gods
>>> are real,
>>
>>Why would I need to show anything?
>>
>>I've made no claim in either direction.
>>
>>Oh, and it's interesting how you always demand the other side has to
>>produce
>>their proof first. It's almost like you're admitting you have no proof to
>>support your own position.
>
>
> Dude go back under your bridge.
Is actual logic and reason more than you can handle?
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
