XPost: can.politics, can.talk.guns, kingston.general
XPost: talk.politics.guns, van.general
From: klunk@theothershoe.org
ahhh.... the sound of yet another gun loon getting his panties caught up in
knots and having a typical hissy fit because he doesn't like that his views
are anachronistic... guess what dimbulb... blah blah blah is all you
apparently understand... but i will tell you this.... yes.... you are the
problem.... typical of all gun loons whose perspective on this issue is
completely self-serving without the slightest care about the impact guns
have on the world around us... yes, asshole... you and the rest of your
inbred, low-browed, knuckle-dragging and emotionally incompetent idiotic
brethren ARE the problem.
"Larry" wrote in message
news:58Awg.47066$Uy1.11405@read1.cgocable.net...
> hey kluck, blah blah blah! I showed you the very people you tree huggers
> have been harping are the ones that should know whether the registry works
> and support it, the Chiefs and police, when in fact do not support the
> registry, and all you can do is spew out, from your single celled
> Darwinism brain, psycho babble with a Freudian truism, citing you were in
> fact not talking about these particular chiefs, police or CACPs', but the
> 2 or 3 that won't fess up they in fact have changed their mind, because
> they would rather play the game than say they erred.
> If you think it is only a few rebel cops that have just jumped ship on
> this, you sir, are sorely mistaken. I have hundreds of statements here
> like the ones I posted, of police all across this country that are out
> there every day putting their lives on the line to protect mindless freaks
> like you, that are saying registration doesn't work. That the millions
> being flushed down the toilet senselessly to track the guns of law abiding
> citizens would be better spent, and we would be much safer, getting
> criminals off the streets. I will gladly email them to you if you wish. I
> wouldn't post them here because it's days of reading there's so many.
> Also, every police officer I talked to locally said the registry hasn't
> helped them at all, not once.
> So, post the proof you claim shows the registry works, then slither back
> into your primordial ooze where you belong with the other worthless
> armchair airheads who are more interested in legislation and noise than
> actually dealing with the problem.
So, your attempt to lie about claims i never made like all the other
assholes only shows how much of a "worthless armchair airhead" you are...
and how little you acually wish to deal with the problem.
> I, sir, am not your problem, it's that guy around the corner from you that
> wouldn't register his weapons because he's not interested in abiding by
> the laws, who you should be looking out for.
I understand that you and your ilk would like to put the blame on someone
else.... but you are the problem and from my perspective it's only a matter
of time before your tentative grasp on your emotions results in a tragedy...
> Also, if you think for one instant I'm not interested in stopping gun
> violence because I don't support the registry, or I don't have a stake in
> wanting to be safe on the street, I have a lot bigger stake than you ever
> will, sir. I still have bullet fragments in both my legs from a repeat
> offender that spent a few days in jail and paid a little fines his first
> gun offences.
interesting how so many of the most vocal loons here speak with experience
from behind bars, rather than from being in a position of putting others
behind bars....
> FYI, he did not have nor ever had an FAC, and he laughed as he said he
> could get a gun whenever he wanted. Oh, he got 7 years for shooting me,
> was out in 4! You think the registry means anything to this lowlife?
no... and nor should it... at least until he's charged with possession of an
unregistered weapon.
> So, the next time you hear of someone getting shot, praying they live, ask
> them which makes more sense to them? Spending money on a registry that
> only tells police what guns I have, because they already know I have some
> with a simple click of the mouse because I have an FAC, or more resources
> to combat and punish criminals? Call me crazy, I vote for the resources,
> that fucking whiteman, and all others like him, should never be allowed to
> walk the streets again. I say, we should have "do unto others as they have
> done unto you" justice.
and here, you've just proven that you sir, do NOT demonstrate sufficiently
adequate emotional and intellectuall capacity and/or restraint to be a
"responsible gun owner"... and in my view, your application should be
rejected.
> I would gladly give the asshole a 300 yard start! With my 7mm rem mag, on
> a bad day, I get less than 2inch groups at 500yards.
> Sorry guys, I know, that doesn't help our cause, but it felt good for a
> moment...I sometimes have to take a moment now and then????!!!!
> Larry
that's ok.... everyone else here prefers to see the real mentalities behind
the agenda and you've just managed to confirm my initial posit... that gun
loons ARE loons.
> "klunk" wrote in message
> news:0wtwg.217075$iF6.107721@pd7tw2no...
>>
>> "0:->" wrote in message
>> news:E_2dnQqwo7Mf_F_ZnZ2dnUVZ_sednZ2d@scnresearch.com...
>>> Larry wrote:
>>>> Well, this is interesting. Remember all that whoopla about the police
>>>> chiefs and CACPs' supposedly in staunch support of the registry, that
>>>> aint xactly true! Here is a little tidbit, which took me hours of
>>>> reading to find, that sure wasn't suppose to be discovered. Seems
>>>> they've been into some mind changin', but we sure weren't suppose to,
>>>> and the Libs' didn't want us, ta find out!
>>>> So, you armchair do-gooders, here's my proof, from da horses mouth so
>>>> to speak, that this registry has absolutely no positive effect in
>>>> keeping YOU safe from guns.
>>>> Now, where is your proof it does?????
>>>>
>>>> "POLICE SAY: GUN REGISTRY IS "DEEPLY, AND POSSIBLY, FATALLY FLAWED"
>>>> Police Association letter: "To think criminals will be affected by
>>>> this legislation is asinine."
>>>>
>>>> Ottawa - Today, Garry Breitkreuz, Official Opposition Firearms Critic
>>>> and MP for Yorkton-Melville, made public a copy of leaked letter that
>>>> adds credence to his claims that the police associations are getting
>>>> ready to withdraw their "official" support from the Liberal's useless
>>>> $400 million gun registry. "We always knew that the vast majority of
>>>> police on the street opposed the gun registration scheme, now we have
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
