XPost: can.politics, can.talk.guns, talk.politics.guns   
   XPost: van.general   
   From: smarskell@cogeco.ca   
      
     (TopPoster) wrote:   
   > In article <58Awg.47066$Uy1.11405@read1.cgocable.net>, kiwi@NOSPAMcogeco.ca   
   > says...   
   >   
   >>hey kluck, blah blah blah! I showed you the very people you tree huggers   
   >>have been harping are the ones that should know whether the registry works   
   >>and support it, the Chiefs and police, when in fact do not support the   
   >>registry, and all you can do is spew out, from your single celled Darwinism   
   >>brain, psycho babble with a Freudian truism, citing you were in fact not   
   >>talking about these particular chiefs, police or CACPs', but the 2 or 3 that   
   >>won't fess up they in fact have changed their mind, because they would   
   >>rather play the game than say they erred.   
   >   
   >   
   > I'm just thanking my lucky stars this guy has no access to guns..   
   >   
   >   
   >>If you think it is only a few rebel cops that have just jumped ship on this,   
   >>you sir, are sorely mistaken. I have hundreds of statements here like the   
   >>ones I posted, of police all across this country that are out there every   
   >>day putting their lives on the line to protect mindless freaks like you,   
   >>that are saying registration doesn't work. That the millions being flushed   
   >>down the toilet senselessly to track the guns of law abiding citizens would   
   >>be better spent, and we would be much safer, getting criminals off the   
   >>streets. I will gladly email them to you if you wish. I wouldn't post them   
   >>here because it's days of reading there's so many. Also, every police   
   >>officer I talked to locally said the registry hasn't helped them at all, not   
   >>once.   
   >>So, post the proof you claim shows the registry works, then slither back   
   >>into your primordial ooze where you belong with the other worthless armchair   
   >>airheads who are more interested in legislation and noise than actually   
   >>dealing with the problem.   
   >>I, sir, am not your problem, it's that guy around the corner from you that   
   >>wouldn't register his weapons because he's not interested in abiding by the   
   >>laws, who you should be looking out for.   
   >>Also, if you think for one instant I'm not interested in stopping gun   
   >>violence because I don't support the registry, or I don't have a stake in   
   >>wanting to be safe on the street, I have a lot bigger stake than you ever   
   >>will, sir. I still have bullet fragments in both my legs from a repeat   
   >>offender that spent a few days in jail and paid a little fines his first gun   
   >>offences.   
   >>FYI, he did not have nor ever had an FAC, and he laughed as he said he could   
   >>get a gun whenever he wanted. Oh, he got 7 years for shooting me, was out in   
   >>4! You think the registry means anything to this lowlife?   
   >>So, the next time you hear of someone getting shot, praying they live, ask   
   >>them which makes more sense to them? Spending money on a registry that only   
   >>tells police what guns I have, because they already know I have some with a   
   >>simple click of the mouse because I have an FAC, or more resources to combat   
   >>and punish criminals? Call me crazy, I vote for the resources, that fucking   
   >>whiteman, and all others like him, should never be allowed to walk the   
   >>streets again. I say, we should have "do unto others as they have done unto   
   >>you" justice.   
   >>I would gladly give the asshole a 300 yard start! With my 7mm rem mag, on a   
   >>bad day, I get less than 2inch groups at 500yards.   
   >>Sorry guys, I know, that doesn't help our cause, but it felt good for a   
   >>moment...I sometimes have to take a moment now and then????!!!!   
   >>Larry   
   >>"klunk"  wrote in message   
   >>news:0wtwg.217075$iF6.107721@pd7tw2no...   
   >>   
   >>>"0:->"  wrote in message   
   >>>news:E_2dnQqwo7Mf_F_ZnZ2dnUVZ_sednZ2d@scnresearch.com...   
   >>>   
   >>>>Larry wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>Well, this is interesting. Remember all that whoopla about the police   
   >>>>>chiefs and CACPs' supposedly in staunch support of the registry, that   
   >>>>>aint xactly true! Here is a little tidbit, which took me hours of   
   >>>>>reading to find, that sure wasn't suppose to be discovered. Seems   
   >>>>>they've been into some mind changin', but we sure weren't suppose to,   
   >>>>>and the Libs' didn't want us, ta find out!   
   >>>>>So, you armchair do-gooders, here's my proof, from da horses mouth so to   
   >>>>>speak, that this registry has absolutely no positive effect in keeping   
   >>>>>YOU safe from guns.   
   >>>>>Now, where is your proof it does?????   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>"POLICE SAY: GUN REGISTRY IS "DEEPLY, AND POSSIBLY, FATALLY FLAWED"   
   >>>>>Police Association letter: "To think criminals will be affected by   
   >>>>>this legislation is asinine."   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>Ottawa - Today, Garry Breitkreuz, Official Opposition Firearms Critic   
   >>>>>and MP for Yorkton-Melville, made public a copy of leaked letter that   
   >>>>>adds credence to his claims that the police associations are getting   
   >>>>>ready to withdraw their "official" support from the Liberal's useless   
   >>>>>$400 million gun registry. "We always knew that the vast majority of   
   >>>>>police on the street opposed the gun registration scheme, now we have   
   >>>>>proof that the executive who represent these rank-and-file officers   
   >>>>>are finally starting to get the message."   
   >>>>>Breitkreuz released a copy of a letter from the Ontario Senior   
   >>>>>Officers' Police Association to Solicitor General Lawrence MacAuley   
   >>>>>dated Friday, January 21, 2000. The 8-page letter provides even more   
   >>>>>evidence that the gun registry is in serious trouble and corroborates   
   >>>>>reports given to Justice Minister Anne McLellan by her own User Group   
   >>>>>on Firearms. The letter states, "There is little doubt that the   
   >>>>>legislation is deeply, and possibly fatally flawed. There was ample   
   >>>>>time to research and prepare appropriately for a feasible and workable   
   >>>>>act - this was not done, in our view."   
   >>>>>Here are a few more quotable quotes from the police association letter   
   >>>>>to the Liberal government:   
   >>>>>·      This.has produced bitterness, acrimony, divisive bickering.and an   
   >>>>>act which, to be kind, is ineffective .   
   >>>>>·      It has created a bureaucratic quagmire and its deterrent effect   
   >>>>>is   
   >>>>>questionable, at best.   
   >>>>>·      A glance at Bill C68 is all that is required to realize that a   
   >>>>>law   
   >>>>>degree is required to understand and use it.   
   >>>>>·      Several thousand FIP hits.because they have been extracted   
   >>>>>several   
   >>>>>times for the same incident.   
   >>>>>·      The original matter has to be re-investigated. Surely, this is   
   >>>>>not   
   >>>>>how the system was designed to work.   
   >>>>>·      Transfers now take up to three days to complete. The sale or   
   >>>>>purchase of a house can take less time.   
   >>>>>·      Firearms businesses are closing because of the.legislation as it   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)