XPost: can.politics, ont.politics, tor.general
XPost: bc.politics
From: his@spam.net
"Billy" wrote in message
news:1160780980.813395.218220@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>
> Karen Gordon wrote:
> >
> >
""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
> > The electric car accelerates so much faster, it makes the Ferrari look
> > like a bicycle.
> >
""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
>
> All the arguments for gas or electric cars are moot since the present
> state of pollutions and gridlocks within the Urban transportation
> systems will dictate banning private cars from the cities.
> Cars are slowly but surely killing the big cities plus in many ways
> when you factor in all the subsidies, they don't make much real
> economical sense.
> We are all silly and irresponsible to wait for the last vital signs of
> our own biosphere to act.
>
> Electric public transit should be given priority for moving people and
> products because
> present power plants as mentioned by some in the thread are more
> efficient at dealing with pollution.
>
> The future of power generation investments should be directed toward
> Hydrogen fuel cells.
>
> While It takes more energy to produce Hydrogen than Hydrogen can
> deliver,
> the main advantages for it over conventional electrical energy
> production is storage and low pollution when compared to gas
> combustion.
> Add to the equation a greener environment and the fact that there are
> lots of latent sources of renewable energy that can be tapped 24/7
Which one of your sources will produce enough power?
to
> produce it. it will become even if not competitive in price, the best
> alternative.
>
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
