Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    ont.general    |    Ontario general chatter    |    8,306 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 6,674 of 8,306    |
|    Some Other Guy to Ceri Thomas    |
|    Re: Tax freedom Calculation Time    |
|    02 Jan 07 20:33:12    |
      XPost: calgary.general, ab.general, ab.politics       XPost: can.general, can.taxes, ont.politics       From: Some@Other.guy              Ceri Thomas wrote:              > Number two; I was talking about private personal healthcare not       > buying a corporate group health care.              I've heard that the premiums for a typical private family health       insurance plan in the US costs $10k per year.              > We are all forced as business owners to pay that workmen       > compensation and never get covered as an owner ourselves anyhow.              In Ontario, given an INCORPORATED company with shareholders and       directors, WSIB premiums are NOT applied to employees if they are       shareholders.              WSIB premiums are charged based on the nature of the business of the       company. If your company does building demolition, then you pay the       highest WSIB premiums. We pay what I think is the lowest - around 30       cents per $100 of gross salary - with a cap if the salary is something       like $90k or $100k. Again, if you're an owner (ie a shareholder) then       WSIB doesn't apply to you (and you also don't pay into UI/EI - your       earnings are not insured which means if you fire yourself then you       can't collect UI).              As an owner/shareholder, if you elect to pay yourself dividends       instead of a salary, then you can receive $36k in dividends and not       pay a dollar in income tax, and I think the tax is something like 18%       on the next 36k of dividend income. Note also that if you receive       your compensation as a dividend, then you also won't have EHT       (employer health tax and the new health SURTAX) or CPP taken off       either. But you still have access to OHIP.              > Not the same elsewhere in the world though I've found out. The US       > doesn't force you to pay health care it's only an option to entise       > employees.              No - in some states (Mass) they have recent laws that everyone MUST       participate in a health insurance plan.              The problem with the US is that health insurance costs a lot because:              1) small businesses are forbidden by law to join or "band" together as       a co-op to get a better deal on health insurance              2) small businesses and even state gov'ts are forbidden by law to       engage in bulk buying or contracts for prescription drugs              3) many single people in their 20's and 30's who are in the work-force       and who are generally healthy choose not to participate in a health       insurance plan. Because you have so many people that do not       participate (and they typically don't consume much in the way of       health care services anyways) what you have left are older people and       families and they must pay more. Car insurance is manditory - but if       it were optional then you'd have some (many?) people that would       opt-out and the premiums would go up for everyone else.              4) there are several million people employed by the US health care       industry and the US health insurance industry who's job it is to push       paper and get on the phone and chase down (and fight about) medical       payments. You don't have that administration cost in Canada (OHIP in       Ontario).              5) Malpractice insurance in the US is obscene - because court awards       for malpractice (pain and suffering and punative dammages) is       outrageous in the US vs Canada. So because doctors have to pay a       fortune for insurance in the US, they also charge more for their       services. Paying a doctor more because of this doesn't mean you get       better care. Many doctors in the US and Canada are cross-educated       (they receive specialized education in each-other's countries as well       as in the UK and Europe. A cardiologist in Boston could have received       his cardiology training in Calgary Alberta (Canada) and a cardiac       surgeon in London (UK) could have gotten his surgical training at       Baylor (Houston, Texas).              The problem with health delivery in Canada (Ontario particularly) is:              1) More women/girls are entering medical school now vs 10, 20, 30       years ago. Women can make great doctors - problem is that quite a few       of them drop out of the workforce to get pregnant and have families       and never return to the medicine. So we have a shortage of doctors.       This is helped by the next point:              2) Medical school costs are too low in Ontario/Canada. In the US, by       the time someone has done 4 or 5 years of general medical school,       they've got a huge debt and want to go out and open a family medical       practice to start earning money and pay down their debt. In       Canada/Ontario, because the cost of medical school is low(er), and       family medicine is looked on as "yukky", many med students go on an       specialize and so we end up with too many specialists and not enough       family doctors.              3) We have a lot of old people in Ontario who fall and break their       hips and jam up orthopedic operating rooms because they need emergency       hip surgery and this causes a huge back-log of elective orthopedic       surgery.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca