Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    ont.general    |    Ontario general chatter    |    8,306 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 6,795 of 8,306    |
|    "TopPoster..." |
|    LOL (1/2)    |
|    07 May 07 12:36:57    |
      XPost: wpg.general, man.general, winnipeg.general       XPost: can.general, edm.general       From: Posters@Top,Posters.com              WASHINGTON - An odd-looking Canadian coin with a bright red flower was the       culprit behind the U.S. Defence Department's false espionage warning earlier       this year, The Associated Press has learned.       The odd-looking - but harmless - "poppy coin" was so unfamiliar to       suspicious U.S. Army contractors travelling in Canada that they filed       confidential espionage accounts about them. The worried contractors       described the coins as "anomalous" and "filled with something man-made that       looked like nano-technology," according to once-classified U.S. government       reports and e-mails obtained by the AP.              The silver-coloured 25-cent piece features the red image of a poppy -       Canada's flower of remembrance - inlaid over a maple leaf. The unorthodox       quarter is identical to the coins pictured and described as suspicious in       the contractors' accounts.              The supposed nano-technology actually was a conventional protective coating       the Royal Canadian Mint applied to prevent the poppy's red colour from       rubbing off. The mint produced nearly 30 million such quarters in 2004       commemorating Canada's 117,000 war dead.               "It did not appear to be electronic (analog) in nature or have a power       source," wrote one U.S. contractor, who discovered the coin in the cup       holder of a rental car. "Under high power microscope, it appeared to be       complex consisting of several layers of clear, but different material, with       a wire like mesh suspended on top."       The confidential accounts led to a sensational warning from the Defence       Security Service, an agency of the Defence Department, that mysterious coins       with radio frequency transmitters were found planted on U.S. contractors       with classified security clearances on at least three separate occasions       between October 2005 and January 2006 as the contractors travelled through       Canada.              One contractor believed someone had placed two of the quarters in an outer       coat pocket after the contractor had emptied the pocket hours earlier. "Coat       pockets were empty that morning and I was keeping all of my coins in a       plastic bag in my inner coat pocket," the contractor wrote.              But the Defence Department subsequently acknowledged that it could never       substantiate the espionage alarm that it had put out and launched the       internal review that turned up the true nature of the mysterious coin.              Meanwhile, in Canada, senior intelligence officials expressed annoyance with       the American spy-coin warnings as they tried to learn more about the oddball       claims.              "That story about Canadians planting coins in the pockets of defence       contractors will not go away," Luc Portelance, now deputy director for the       Canadian Security Intelligence Service, wrote in a January e-mail to a       subordinate. "Could someone tell me more? Where do we stand and what's the       story on this?"              Others in Canada's spy service also were searching for answers. "We would be       very interested in any more detail you may have on the validity of the       comment related to the use of Canadian coins in this manner," another       intelligence official wrote in an e-mail. "If it is accurate, are they       talking industrial or state espionage? If the latter, who?" The identity of       the e-mail's recipient was censored.              Intelligence and technology experts were flabbergasted over the warning when       it was first publicized earlier this year. The warning suggested that such       transmitters could be used surreptitiously to track the movements of people       carrying the coins.              "I thought the whole thing was preposterous, to think you could tag an       individual with a coin and think they wouldn't give it away or spend it,"       said H. Keith Melton, a leading intelligence historian.              But Mr. Melton said the Army contractors properly reported their suspicions.       "You want contractors or any government personnel to report anything       suspicious," he said. "You can't have the potential target evaluating       whether this was an organized attack or a fluke."              The Defence Security Service disavowed its warning about spy coins after an       international furor, but until now it has never disclosed the details behind       the embarrassing episode. The U.S. said it never substantiated the       contractors' claims and performed an internal review to determine how the       false information was included in a 29-page published report about espionage       concerns.              The Defence Security Service never examined the suspicious coins,       spokeswoman Cindy McGovern said. "We know where we made the mistake," she       said. "The information wasn't properly vetted. While these coins aroused       suspicion, there ultimately was nothing there."              A numismatist consulted by the AP, Dennis Pike of Canadian Coin & Currency       near Toronto, quickly matched a grainy image and physical descriptions of       the suspect coins in the contractors' confidential accounts to the 25-cent       poppy piece.              "It's not uncommon at all," Mr. Pike said. He added that the coin's       protective coating glows peculiarly under ultraviolet light. "That may have       been a little bit suspicious," he said.              Some of the U.S. documents the AP obtained were classified "Secret/Noforn,"       meaning they were never supposed to be viewed by foreigners, even America's       closest allies. The government censored parts of the files, citing national       security reasons, before turning over copies under the U.S. Freedom of       Information Act.              Nothing in the documents - except the reference to nanotechnology -       explained how the contractors' accounts evolved into a full-blown warning       about spy coins with radio frequency transmitters. Many passages were       censored, including the names of contractors and details about where they       worked and their projects.              But there were indications the accounts should have been taken lightly. Next       to one blacked-out sentence was this warning: "This has not been confirmed       as of yet."              The Canadian intelligence documents, which also were censored, were turned       over to the AP for $5 under that country's Access to Information Act. Canada       cited rules for protecting against subversive or hostile activities to       explain why it censored the papers.               a.. Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin       once        they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear.       If        a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it        should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded,       but        the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the       erroneous              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca