XPost: can.internet.highspeed   
   From: dave-no_spam@nospam.net   
      
   "qwerty" <123@456.com> wrote in message news:48A8275F.DC776883@456.com...   
   > Canuck57 wrote:   
   >   
   >> > I believe I heard on the news the family asked that it not be   
   >> > publicized.  Which makes you wonder why...   
   >   
   > Did he die of something embarrasing?   
   >   
   > It does make you wonder.   
   >   
   >> Grieving.   
   >   
   > I doubt that was the reason.   
   >   
   >> He gave his life.   
   >   
   > Actually, I don't think he did.  Don't embellish his death.   
      
   Neither do I, we lots a good citizen that day.   
      
   > It's been stated many times that he *did not* die because of any   
   > blunt-force trauma.  He was technically off duty, and just happened to   
   > be on-scene (or perhaps closer to the scene than other civillians).  I   
   > don't think anyone actually saw him die - it was more like they just   
   > discovered him dead.  Not sure what exactly he was doing at the time.   
      
   People who rescue and aid others don't turn it off 9-5 like you do, it is a   
   way of life.   
      
   > Either it was something stupid or embarrasing, or he died of a heart   
   > attack or stroke.  Maybe he had too much to drink that night, maybe he   
   > was coming home from a stag or a strip club and tripped and hit his head   
   > on the curb.   
      
   Speak for yourself.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)