c8c99200   
   XPost: ab.general, bc.general, can.politics   
   From: len@nospam.com   
      
   "jimjames5417"  wrote in message   
   news:7323ea01-07a2-45e1-8f7d-fdf9ea138987@v30g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...   
   On Oct 15, 4:38 pm, Fabrikant  wrote:   
   > Here is suggestion: if you know well how to design a website and give   
   > it a name indict Harper, invite public to sign a petition if they   
   > agree that Harper should be indicted for squandering 300 million tax   
   > payer dollars and also breeching of his own law, which established   
   > specific dates for the election. He also should be ordered to pay 300   
   > million back and this should be done by garnishing 25% of his salary   
   > until he dies.   
   >   
   > Fabrikant   
      
   Boy, the left-wing loons are out in force today!! What bitter little   
   people!   
   For goodness sake, get a life!! You are almost as bad as Fraud Old   
   Boob, Road Kill Roedy and the Dung!!   
      
   ===============   
      
   Well, JJ,  I just got a chance to skim through some of these posts and the   
   same thought crossed my mind.   
   The excuses they dream up to justify their hatred of Harper sure make them   
   sound like 'bitter little people'.  . If Harper was a Liberal they'd be   
   saying all nice things about him being the best PM ever.   
      
   Maybe the four year mandate thing should have been spelled out more clearly   
   or maybe it was left vague for a purpose.  Nobody can predict the future and   
   it's wise to leave room for any government to maneuver and let the people   
   decide.   
      
   These 'little people' didn't complain when both Martin and Chrétien called   
   unnecessary elections.  This law sure wasn't meant to only give the   
   opposition   
   the right to call an election when it suited them...that wouldn't make   
   sense..... take the right away from the PM and give it to the opposition..I   
   don't think so.   
      
    How many times did we hear Dion brag that HE would call the election when   
   the time suited HIIM , with no mention of cost of course.  As for cost, it   
   was merely moved ahead a year as next year wouldn't be a freebee.  The GG   
   and her staff would have considered all of this and could have turned Harper   
   down if he was breaking any law, keeeping in mind that she was a Liberal   
   appointee.   
      
   When Harper met with all the leaders before calling the election, all any   
   one of them had to say was that they'd agree not to vote against all his   
   legislation. Dion had sat on his hands for two years , so what was one more   
   year. He could have protested any of Harpers legislation but simply not   
   bring the government at his, Dions, convenience.   
      
   I got a kick out of the Liberals claiming that Harper's gov't had   
   accomplished nothing after they and their buddies in the Senate blocked or   
   delayed or rewrote every bill..  Then when Harper called an election, they   
   claimed puzzlement because he had accomplished a lot. They didn't mention   
   the 43 non-confidence votes it took but then they complained about them at   
   other times.  Maybe that's why the little guys are so confused.   
      
   Fixed election dates simply won't work in our system unless the opposition   
   agrees.   
   It's not rocket science but these guys can't seem to grasp the basics..   
   Hate blinds reason , I guess.   
   -lm   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)