XPost: can.general, ott.general
From: anonymous@anonymitaet-im-inter.net
Gay Ken McVay SOBC wants all to know:
Zionist News + Jewish Lawyer Blast CHRC & Warman - As NAZIS!
Zionist owned newspaper National Post, and noted jurist
Ezra Levant have blasted the Canadian Human Rights Commission,
and pet complainer thereof Richard Warman.
They are being denounced as NAZIS!
In a banner-headline huge editorial in the National Post,
across Canada,on Wednesday July 15 2009, lawyer Ezra Levant
really lays into CHRC and criminal Richard Warman.
Levant starts with a denunciation of the criminal activities
of CHRC, as exposed at the CHRC hearing March 25 2008.
At that time Alain Monfette Bell Canada security officer, had
testified that CHRC had illegally accessed the internet, using
the private account of an innocent woman, Nelly Hechme.
Marc Lemire has in fact laid criminal charges against CHRC
in connection with these criminal acts.
In his editorial, Lawyer Ezra Levant further denounces CHRC and
Richard Warman as NAZIS!
Levant states that CHRC members have been active members of
neo-nazi groups for years.
Further he states that they have published countless anti-semitic,
anti-gay and anti-black comments on the internet.
CHRC have even admitted these criminal acts under oath!
Dean Steacy, a senior CHRC member has testified that at least
7 CHRC staff are members of nazi groups.
Especially noted is that former CHRC investigator and current
serial witness and perpetual complainer RICHARD WARMAN is a
prominent NAZI among the seven!!
The tribunal investigating the illegal and criminal acts of CHRC
4 months ago, was forced to issue a damning report on the illegal
activities of CHRC and Warman:
"I do not see any acceptable reason for [Richard] Warman to have
participated on the Stormfront or Vanguard [neo-nazi] sites."
It appears that CHRC has more NAZI members than did the
Canadian Nazi Party when it existed briefly in the 1960's.
Neo-Nazi hate, courtesy of the CHRC
Ezra Levant, National Post Published: Wednesday, July 15, 2009
Last month, a parliamentary committee invited Jennifer Lynch, the head of
the Canadian Human Rights Commission, to answer questions about her
agency's conduct. She refused to attend, sending in her place a deputy who
could not answer key questions put to him by MP Russ Hiebert.
Now that Parliament is safely on summer holidays, Lynch has bravely
emerged from her bunker -- the CHRC office actually is a bulletproof
bunker -- to accuse Hiebert of getting his facts wrong.
But it's Lynch's version that's false.
In her July 11 letter to the National Post, Lynch denies that CHRC staff
hacked into the Internet account of a private citizen to cover their
tracks as they logged into their memberships in neo-Nazi websites. Lynch
says both the Privacy Commissioner and the RCMP "found no evidence to
support this allegation."
But that's not true. The Privacy Commissioner's staff did not investigate
the hacking -- that is not within their jurisdiction. They only examined
"whether the CHRC improperly collected, used, disclosed or retained
personal information about the complainant," a different and irrelevant
question.
And neither did the RCMP declare that there was "no evidence" to the
accusation. They investigated for months. Only when the case led them to a
U. S.-based Internet server did they drop their investigation rather than
pursue it internationally. That's quite a different thing from exonerating
the CHRC.
There was a hearing into the matter, though, at the Canadian Human Rights
Tribunal on March 25, 2008. Alain Monfette, Bell Canada's security
officer, testified that the CHRC accessed the Internet using that private
citizen's Bell account. Lynch's lawyers sat in embarrassed silence -- they
did not rebut Monfette's evidence nor even bother to cross-examine him.
As Nelly Hechme, the hacking victim, told reporters, "I merely wanted some
answers and maybe a little justice, but that doesn't seem to be the case.
I feel like I'm basically being told to just accept it."
Lynch is pretending that Hechme doesn't even exist. But that pales in
comparison to Lynch's statement that CHRC staff did not "post hateful
messages on the Internet."
In fact, CHRC employees have been active members of neo-Nazi organizations
for years, and have published countless anti-Semitic, anti-gay and anti-
black comments online. CHRC employees have admitted to this under oath. On
the same day Monfette testified about the hacking, CHRC investigator Dean
Steacy testified there were no guidelines about what CHRC staff could do
using their online Nazi memberships.
Steacy, for example, used his Nazi membership to write encouraging words
to a racist group called B. C. White Pride. He praised them, told them
their racist posters were "great" and promised to distribute their
literature. Your tax dollars at work.
Other CHRC investigators went further. One praised Nazi leaders ( "I still
say [Adrien] Arcand is our man!"); called for Canadian police to
discriminate against blacks ( "exactly when will white cops understand
that they should stand by THEIR race?!"); and trashed a Jewish youth group
( "if people spent the time building fellow WNs [White Nationalists] up
rather than tearing them down we'd be dangerous. Unless your goal is to
tear people down in which case go join Hillel or something.")
Neo-Nazi hate, courtesy of the CHRC
Ezra Levant, National Post Published: Wednesday, July 15, 2009
At least 12 CHRC prosecutions have been tainted by CHRC staff or witnesses
using agent provocateur tactics like that. They've even written Nazi
shorthand for "Heil Hitler".
Steacy testified that at least seven CHRC staff have access to Nazi
membership accounts: Steacy himself, his two personal assistants,
investigator Sandy Kozak, lawyer Giacomo Vigna, manager John Chamberlin,
and former CHRC investigator and current serial witness and complainant
Richard Warman.
By sheer numbers, the Canadian Human Rights Commission has more Nazi
members than the tiny Canadian Nazi Party did when it briefly existed in
the 1960s.
If real police and prosecutors behaved this way, they would be suspended
and any criminal charges tainted by such misconduct would be stayed. Not
so at the CHRC, which lacks an internal affairs office or written
operational policies. It doesn't even have a code of ethics.
It's become so embarrassing that even the tribunal -- the kangaroo court
that rubber-stamps CHRC censorship prosecutions -- has ended its silence.
Four months ago, the tribunal examined some of these comments, including
one denouncing Jewish politicians as "scum."
"I do not see any acceptable reason for [Richard] Warman to have
participated on the Stormfront or Vanguard [neo-Nazi] sites," wrote the
tribunal. "It is possible that his activity in this regard could have
precipitated further hate messages in response ... The evidence in this
case of his participating on Internet sites similar to the Northern
Alliance [neo-Nazi] site is both disappointing and disturbing."
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
