Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    ont.general    |    Ontario general chatter    |    8,306 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 7,859 of 8,306    |
|    PaulFromm to All    |
|    Undercover work of R.Warman posting as n    |
|    19 Jan 12 03:43:28    |
      XPost: alt.revisionism, can.general       From: paul@paulfromm.com              Richard Warman posed as a supporter on neo-Nazis' websites to "[obtain]              Joseph Brean, National Post · Dec. 13, 2011 | Last Updated: Dec. 13, 2011       3:09AM       Richard Warman, the serial hate-speech complainant whose case against webmaster       Marc Lemire will be heard in Federal Court Tuesday on a constitutional appeal,       is known by many false names.              The grandest is Canada's Hatefinder-General, a mocking epithet coined by       celebrity human rights victim and columnist Mark Steyn. The most improbable is       Mary Dufford, as whom he corresponded with Eldon Warman, no relation, a radical       anti-Semitic "de-tax" activist, seeking to confirm his receipt of legal       documents.              AxeToGrind, as whom Mr. Warman posted 33 messages on the white supremacist       Vanguard News Network between 2004 and 2005, seems to speak for itself. Pogue       Mahone, his handle for 93 posts on the white power site Stormfront, means "kiss       my arse" in Gaelic.       But the longest-lasting alias is Lucy, or Lucie, in honour of Lucie Aubrac, who       died in 2007, and was a hero of the French Resistance against the Nazis.              It is a curious historical nod for the lawyer and thricefailed Green Party       candidate whose pursuit of hate-speech cases against neo-Nazis and other       hatemongers involved posing as a supporter on their message boards, praising       their leaders, and even signing off with "88," a coded reference to "Heil       Hitler."              This unsupervised freelance undercover work by Mr. Warman - who worked for the       Canadian Human Rights Commission from 2002 to 2004, and has successfully       pursued       15 hate-speech cases, often with the CHRC arguing the case on his behalf, and       with his help - was a key point in the public outcry against Section 13, the       Internet hate speech section of the Canadian Human Rights Act.              The majority Conservative government has vowed to repeal the law as an affront       to free speech, even as the Supreme Court of Canada deliberates on a separate       case that could see Section 13's legal foundation struck down.              At Tuesday's hearing in Toronto to decide whether Section 13 is constitutional,       the CHRC is expected to argue that its own practices in fighting hate on the       Internet are irrelevant to the question of Section 13's constitutionality.       Evidence presented throughout the Lemire case revealed those practices to be       heavily influenced by Mr. Warman, who once urged the CHRC to "hold off on       informing" Mr. Lemire about the expansion of the investigation against him       "until the police take a good look" at some new allegations. No criminal       charges       were ever filed.              Details of the extent of the Lucie pseudonym are included in records of a       separate libel suit Mr. Warman brought against bloggers. The National Post also       was sued over the alleged libel, but issued a retrac-tion and apology, and       settled the lawsuit.              In a forensic analysis of the hard drive of a laptop belonging to Mr. Warman,       the word Aubrack turned up 1,460 times, largely from email records of an       address       in that name.       The analysis also turned up "n-gger" and       "c--t" 4,062 and 259 times respectively, which René Hamel of Digital Wyzdom       Forensic Inc. reported was "consistent with Mr. Warman's lengthy human rights       work collecting evidence of hate group activity."              "I signed up and posted to the neo-Nazi website forums vnnforum.com and       stormfront.org as another means of collecting intelligence about the neo-Nazi       and white supremacist movements and information about the identities of       individuals in Canada that it was my intention to file federal human rights       complaints against," Mr. Warman said in an affidavit last year as part of the       libel suit. "Purporting to be interested in, or a supporter of, the beliefs of       a       closed group is a standard practice for obtaining information that would       otherwise be unavailable. The vast majority of these postings are entirely       banal...."              To explain why he made comments about two neo-Nazis who do not fit the typical       mould - one was not white, the other disabled - he said in his affidavit that       "contemporary neo-Nazi groups have often splintered or excluded individuals as       a       result of arcane suspicions about the racial lineage of members or leaders. It       has thus been a useful technique to sow doubt about such matters...."              In upholding one of his hate complaints, Edward Peter Lustig, chairman of the       Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, also said Mr. Warman's hateposing "diminishes       his credibility" and "could have precipitated further hate messages."              Mr. Warman has even been accused of hate speech himself: once when the       respondent in Tuesday's case, Marc Lemire, sought to add Mr. Warman as a       respondent to his own complaint, on the theory that Mr. Warman had anonymously       written a comment on his message board; and later when Alex Kulbashian, whom       Mr.       Warman won a hate speech complaint against, complained he had anonymously       violated Section 13 on Stormfront and VNN. That complaint was dismissed as       vexatious.              Mr. Warman denies writing anything on Mr. Lemire's Freedomsite. Neither the       analysis by Digital Wyzdom, nor a subsequent one, turned up any evidence that       Mr. Warman had written the message at the heart of the libel suit.              "Mr. Lemire and his direct associates had always been cautious enough never to       spread the allegation outside of the CHRT hearing. Indeed, one of Mr. Lemire's       closest associates indicated in an Internet posting that they had legal advice       not to do so (presumably knowing they would be sued for libel)," Mr. Warman       said       in his affidavit.              Mr. Warman did not attend much of the tribunal against Mr. Lemire, but he is       expected to make submissions Tuesday in support of Section 13.       jbrean@nationalpost.com              ----------------------------------------------------------------       ---------------       Unsubscribe / Change Profile       Powered by YMLP              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca