Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    ont.general    |    Ontario general chatter    |    8,306 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 7,996 of 8,306    |
|    Greg Carr to All    |
|    SCC Declines To Hear Hell`s Angels Appea    |
|    21 Jan 14 18:54:52    |
      XPost: can.politics, tor.general, alt.true-crime       From: gregcarrsober@gmail.com              LONDON, ON - The former head of London's Hells Angels has failed in a       bid to get the nation's highest court involved in a key provincial       battle over his strip club.       The Supreme Court of Canada dismissed Rob Barletta's leave to appeal an       earlier court decision, sending the precedent-setting contest between       outlaw bikers and the province back to square one - a simple licence       appeal tribunal.              But the mere fact the liquor licence hearing has gone so far in the       court system underlines the high stakes involved.              Since 2009, Ontario has been trying to load new ammunition in its war on       outlaw bikers by getting a precedent-setting ruling to yank the licences       for bars and other businesses run by those with ties to the gangs.              That would be a body blow to gangs using legitimate businesses to raise       or launder money, police and crime experts say.              "From everything we've seen in the last 30 or 40 years, the Hells Angels       is heavily involved in criminal activities, particularly drugs, and       prostitution and extortion and murder. You don't get much more criminal       than that," crime writer James Dubro said Monday.              "While it's not illegal to be a member of a biker gang, it seems to me       common sense you don't want to give liquor licences or any special       privileges or a taxi licence to someone you have good intelligence       information is a professional criminal. It's just common sense."              That view is shared by the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario. The       province's liquor law bans anyone from a licence if their "past or       present conduct" suggests they won't carry on business with "integrity       and honesty."              Backed by police testimony, the ACGO argued in an earlier hearing       Barletta has to be "100% devoted" to the Hells Angels with a "good       criminal network" and "good aptitude for criminal activity," meaning he       can't carry on his bar and strip club with integrity and honesty.              Barletta has acknowledged he's a full-patch member of the Hells Angels       and a former president of its London chapter.              But his lawyers argue that isn't proof he's breaching the Liquor Act.       Barletta has owned the business for 10 years without breaking any laws       and himself has no criminal record, his lawyers argue.              In 2011, the AGCO's own board ruled Barletta wasn't doing anything       wrong, as far as the strip club was concerned.              The AGCO appealed that decision to Ontario divisional court, but lost.              The AGCO then appealed the divisional court ruling to Ontario's court of       appeal, its highest court, and won.              The appeal court ruled the alcohol board and the divisional court both       made errors in law, and ordered a new hearing in front of Ontario's       Licence Appeal Tribunal.              But Barletta sought leave to appeal that decision to the Supreme Court       of Canada, which dismissed his leave last week.              No date has been set for the appeal tribunal hearing, a spokesperson said.                                   --       *Read and obey the Bible*              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca