XPost: can.politics, tor.general, ont.politics   
   From: none@present.com   
      
   "{~_~}Раиса"  wrote in message news:bKIlv.1103978$ka5.631252@fx06.iad...   
      
   > Kim Dobranski aka M.I.Wakefield wrote:   
   > > Here's a hint how that happened:  Producers of wind and solar are paid a   
   > > lot more for their power than hydro and nuclear ... What do you think   
   > > that does to the prices charged to consumers?   
   >   
   > Tesla electric cars cost a lot more than gas-powered cars coming off mass   
   > production lines.   
   > What if Tesla became the mass-produced cars in future?  What would be   
   > their costs then?   
      
   Useless analogy ... Teslas use electricity, the don't create it.   
      
   > Same as any green power sources, ya dumb rabbit . . . . once they become   
   > the norm, they become much cheaper to consumers.   
      
   If new technology is introduced, maybe ... not with the current technology,   
   where the Liberals signed a contract that was for almost twice-as-much, per   
   capita, as the F-35 is projected to cost.   
      
   > All it takes is thinking ahead on the environment and renewable resources   
   > vs non-renewable and dirty resources.   
      
   Like replacing coal-fired plants with natural gas powered plants?   
      
   Another billion dollars pissed away by the Liberals.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)