Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    ont.general    |    Ontario general chatter    |    8,306 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 8,066 of 8,306    |
|    kdelamont@gmail.com to Dr. Robert Riley    |
|    Re: COURTS TO REVIEW PROJECT GUARDIAN: H    |
|    12 May 15 20:55:35    |
      anyone still out here? Would love to chat -- writing a major piece on PG.       email kdelamont@gmail.com              On Saturday, February 1, 1997 at 3:00:00 AM UTC-5, Dr. Robert Riley wrote:       > From:       > Xtra! (Toronto's Lesbian and Gay Biweekly)       > 2nd Floor, 491 Church Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada       >       > January 30, 1997       >       > COURTS TO REVIEW PROJECT GUARDIAN       > Have police discriminated against gay men?       >       > Story by Joseph Couture       >       > The tables have turned on Project Guardian -- and now it's the London       police       > who'll be on trial.       >       > Defence lawyer David Corbett has successfully argued to a London judge that       > one of his clients cannot be fairly tried without examining the way in which       > police handled some of their investigations in the Project Guardian dragnet.       >       > "In the exercise of their investigation and prosecutorial discretion, the       > London Police Force has applied different standards and techniques to       policing       > alleged sexual offences involving juvenile males and juvenile females, based       > on their belief that homosexuality is bad in and of itself, and that sexual       > relationships between juvenile males and other males are bad and unnatural,"       > Corbett told a judge during a December Ontario Court, General Division       > hearing.       >       > And Justice Peter Hockin ruled, in a decision signed Jan 10, that the court       > should examine whether police have discriminated on the basis of sexual       > orientation.       >       > No date has yet been set for that hearing.       >       > Lawyer Corbett calls the ruling precedent setting. It sends the message that       > "police forces cannot exercise their discretion in a manner that       discriminates       > on the basis of sexual orientation."       >       > But Corbett warns that activists should not expect too much of the review.       >       > The main issue, he says, is the apparently selective application of the law       > pertaining to under-aged prostitutes, and not to Project Guardian in its       > entirety. Project Guardian, launched by the London Police, has resulted in       > the arrest of more than 60 gay men. They have been branded as paedophiles,       > but the majority have in fact been charged with paying someone under 18 for       > sex. Most of the hustlers are over 14, the legal age of consent.       >       > Corbett is representing a Toronto resident who is facing prostitution-related       > charges involving young males.       >       >       > ---EOF              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca