XPost: can.politics, uk.politics.misc, bc.general   
   From: os333@netc.eu   
      
   Dhu on Gate,    
   > On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 02:09:32 +0300, Oleg Smirnov wrote:   
      
   >>> The Aztecs were in North America.  They ate people like you.   
   >>> You might call it genocide, but from my POV its eugenics.   
   >>   
   >> By the way, the Aztecs were in the Spanish area, and it's visible well   
   >> that in those North-American areas where the Spanish colonization was   
   >> dominant, the native ethnic component is preserved much better than in   
   >   
   > Dumbshit.  Tell me why there's more folk in India or China than Russia....   
   >   
   > It has something to do with that white stuff you call sneg: the tundra   
   > comes a lot further south here in Canada...   
      
   There's much snow in Alaska, as well as the preserved natives.   
      
   The English area of colonization isn't like a tundra nor like the impassable   
   taiga among the Siberian permafrost, it's a pretty good and warm climate,   
   and so the area must have been densely populated before the English arrival.   
      
   If all those people weren't genocided out, then they would be visible today.   
      
   >> the areas where the colonization was led by the English. It is telling.   
   >> In Alaska, initially colonized by the Russians, it was also preserved.   
   >   
   > Tell me about Pugachev, or dozens of similar...  How many people were   
   > skinned alive in Canada?  Oh, wait.  It was Mowhawks who did the   
   > shake'n'bake Jesuit trick...  My kin ;-)   
      
   You just show your ignorance about facts once again. Pugachyov had nothing   
   to do with colonization. He was a bold rebel against the tsardom in the   
   1770s, created a short-term quasi-state in the Volga / Urals region.   
   His militia included Christians, Muslims, Buddhists, Shamanists, - of many   
   different ethnicities, equally unhappy with the tsarist policies.   
      
   Also, I don't refer to 'spicy' stories of controversial or unknown origin   
   but reason on the basis of common sense and easily visible or verifiable   
   things. I cannot guess about the number of 'skinned alive'. But there's a   
   known fact that the N.American natives were subjected to hunt for a reward   
   from the colonial authorities, - for their scalps. This genocidal practice   
   existed until the late 19 century, and I can reasonably suspect that quite   
   many of those scalps had been taken off from people that were still alive.   
      
   >> So, namely the English were the most ruthless, savage and genocidal.   
   >>   
   >> Later your smart minders made up the 'deadly epidemic diseases' hoax.   
   >   
   > You are sooo full of shit.   
      
   Ignorance and lack of critical thinking is your comfort.   
      
   You just don't feel comfortable outside your cozy bubble. The 'deadly   
   epidemics' is certainly a hoax. It suddenly turns out to be so-o important   
   namely for the English colonization, but in other known contacts of remote   
   groups there's usually nothing of "they entirely died out because of the   
   diseases".   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)