Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    ont.politics    |    Ontario politics    |    90,757 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 88,850 of 90,757    |
|    =?UTF-8?B?IijgsqBf4LKgKSAi?= to All    |
|    13% of private clinics =?UTF-8?B?ZG9u4oC    |
|    02 Nov 14 16:29:39    |
      XPost: can.politics, tor.general       From: Panca@nyet.ca              Safety inspections find 13% of private clinics don’t meet provincial       standards                     Thirteen per cent of health clinics in Ontario that do procedures such as       cosmetic surgery, colonoscopies and pain injections have not met inspection       standards since they began in 2011, an analysis by the Star has found.              This includes the 3.6 per cent of clinics that have failed inspections because       of public safety concerns.              Critics say the numbers are too high and raise serious questions about the       quality of care at these clinics.               List: Clinics that failed the College of Physicians safety inpections               “A rate of one in seven clinics failing or passing with conditions is just       deplorable. That is a failing grade no matter how you look at it,” charged       medical negligence lawyer Amani Oakley.              “I seriously question whether the inability to do Job 1 — that is, protect       the       public — can be rectified by something less than a complete overhaul of the       system we have,” she said.              Of the 330 clinics the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario has       inspected since 2011, 44 have fallen short of meeting standards.              Twelve failed inspections and 33 were given conditional passes — some of       them,       two or even three times. (One clinic received both a fail and a conditional       pass. An additional 22 clinics — not counted in the 13 per cent — were       given       conditional passes because they were either new or offering new procedures, not       because they had not met standards.)              “The percentage of clinics that did not pass inspection without conditions       should be setting off alarm bells. Imagine an airline industry where one in 10       planes does not pass scrutiny. The frequency and intensity of inspections needs       to be immediately stepped up,” said medical negligence lawyer Paul Harte.              CPSO spokesperson Kathryn Clarke said the public should take comfort in the       fact the college is providing oversight of the clinics, something not done       until recently.              Prior to 2010, no organization had the authority to regulate the clinics, known       as out-of-hospital premises, she said, adding the college had “advanced the       idea” of doing the job to protect the public.              “This means a significant improvement in public safety has occurred since the       establishment of the program because a number of premises that were not meeting       the standards are no longer providing (invasive procedures requiring       anesthesia) to patients,” she said.              Queen’s Park gave regulatory oversight of the clinics to the college       following       a Star investigation into the regulatory black hole surrounding Ontario’s       cosmetic industry.              Its move came a year after the 2007 death of Krista Stryland, a young mother       who underwent liposuction at a Toronto cosmetic clinic.              A total of 440 inspections have been carried out on out-of-hospital clinics to       date, the Star’s analysis has found. Three have had the results of       inspections       pending for more than a year.              Harte said Toronto restaurants fare better in inspections than health-care       facilities do. A 2012 analysis by the now-defunct Grid newspaper showed 8.6 per       cent of inspections carried out by Toronto Public Health resulted in either       conditional passes or closure notices, and only 0.14 per cent resulted in a       closure notices outright.              Another source of comparison to out-of-hospital premises is hospitals. Since       2011, none of Ontario’s 150 hospitals has failed an accreditation review with       Accreditation Canada, an organization that measures quality standards.              Harte said the clinic inspection results are of great concern, especially       because the province is moving services out of hospitals and into clinics. In       2010, there were 209 clinics in Ontario. Today, 264 are operating and a further       10 are in the process of being set up. That’s a 31 per cent increase, and the       provincial government wants the sector to expand even more.              Clinics do not have the same degree of checks and balances as hospitals, and       critics say this needs to change.              Harte called on Health Minister Eric Hoskins to establish quality targets for       the clinics, as well as a timeline for meeting them.              Earlier this month, Hoskins announced measures to improve transparency in the       health system and to improve oversight of these clinics. He asked Health       Quality Ontario to lead an evaluation of current oversight programs in such       clinics and to make recommendations on improvements.              Hoskins’ announcement followed a Star investigation into infection outbreaks       at       clinics.              Since the Star reported in 2012 that nine clinics had failed inspections, three       more have failed theirs. They include two hair-transplant clinics in Toronto       and a pain clinic in Burlington.              Reasons for the recent failures include not having medical directors, not       properly cleaning equipment and not being set up to provide IV resuscitation       drugs in an emergency.              When clinics fail inspections, doctors working there are prohibited from       performing invasive procedures requiring anesthesia.              Progressive Conservative MPP (Leeds-Grenville) Steve Clark said he was       “shocked” that so many clinics did not receive full passes.              “I have a real feeling that there needs to be some systemic changes at the       CPSO,” said Clark, who recently tabled a private member’s bill , calling       for       more transparency from the organization.              The Star undertook the clinic analysis after the CPSO twice refused in recent       weeks to reveal how many clinics had failed inspections, how many had passed       and how many had passed with conditions.              Clarke said the CPSO did not gather information that way and directed the Star       to the organization’s online register , which requires users to look up each       clinic individually. She warned that there were chances of making errors when       doing manual counts.              When the Star asked a third time for a breakdown of inspection results, Clarke       provided the current status of clinics. There are 223 clinics registered with       full passes, 16 with conditional passes, 25 awaiting inspection results and 66       that have withdrawn from the program, meaning they are no longer offering       invasive procedures requiring anesthesia. Those that have withdrawn include       clinics that failed their inspections.              Harte agrees with critics such as Oakley who are calling for an overhaul to the       inspection system. He said the province should set up a separate body to       inspect clinics, one with more teeth and subject to freedom-of-information       searches to ensure transparency.              “Public confidence in the CPSO as an effective regulator of these clinics is       sorely lacking. The problems relating to clinic inspections ultimately stem              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca