XPost: can.politics, bc.politics, ab.politics   
   XPost: sk.politics, man.politics, mtl.general   
   From: Panca@nyet.ca   
      
   (ಠ_ಠ)Раиса   wrote...   
   >> The media should have left the Ghomeshi case where it belonged:  in a court   
   >> room to be decided between accuser and accused.  Only after such   
   determination   
   >> of guilt or innocence should the name of the accused and the names of the   
   >> accusers been published.   
      
   Eric Schild eric@nil.invalid.com wrote:   
   > [Snip rest of rant]   
   > Let's set aside for the moment my long history of smearing people with   
   > no evidence whatsoever m'kay?   
      
   Okay.   
   I just wanted to add that the interview of a CBC female executive, Heather   
   Conway, exposed some very valuable information that the lawyer for Ghomeshi is   
   going to use:   
      
   1.  There were no problems on the job with Ghomeshi relating to harassment,   
   sexual assault, or discipline.   
   2.  Even though  there were none (of the above), they fired Ghomeshi for   
   "violence against women" relating to his private sexual affairs.   
   3.  Mansbridge replied to the last statement with two very important questions.   
      Watch the interview to understand what those questions - and the   
   ramifications of them - are going to be:   
      
   		http://www.cbc.ca/player/News/TV%20Shows/The%20National/ID/2591408941/   
      
   Mansbridge always comes across as a very reasoned, calm and thoughtful   
   interviewer.  But you can sense that he's not conducting this interview for the   
   benefit or comfort of his CBC masters.  He's asking some very important   
   questions.  Good luck to the CBC in the courtroom after this interview.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)