Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    ont.politics    |    Ontario politics    |    90,757 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 89,041 of 90,757    |
|    =?UTF-8?B?IijgsqBf4LKgKSAi?= to All    |
|    Want a prostitute in Toronto?    |
|    06 Dec 14 16:11:24    |
      XPost: can.politics, tor.general       From: Panca@nyet.ca              Your only source for hooker/escort advertisements will be a single publication:        (or you can ask M.I.Wakefield, he purports to know everything about Toronto)        (=_=) !!       ________________________________       The Canadian Press Posted: Dec 06, 2014              Now Magazine plans to defy ad ban in new prostitution bill       Alternative newspaper has long published ads promoting sexual services in back       pages                     A ban on advertising sexual services takes effect Saturday as part of the       federal government's new prostitution laws — but at least one of Canada's       leading independent newspapers says it plans to defy it.              The prohibition is one of several sweeping new changes to the way prostitution       is now regulated in Canada in the wake of a Supreme Court decision last year       that found the old laws violated the rights of prostitutes.              But Toronto's Now Magazine, which has long published ads promoting sexual       services in the back pages of its weekly tabloid, has no plans to stop, said       Alice Klein, the alternative newspaper's editor and chief executive officer.              "Now Magazine started taking sex ads because we take ads, that's how we support       ourselves and we have always refused to discriminate against sex work and sex       workers," she said in an interview.              "We are committed to free expression and we don't believe it's our right to say       which advertisers are allowed to advertise and which advertisers aren't."              The Supreme Court struck down Canada's old prostitution laws last year, ruling       they deprived sex workers of the right to a safe and secure environment.              In response, the government introduced Bill C-36, which upended prostitution       legislation in Canada by criminalizing the purchase of sex — but not its       sale.              Through the law, the government is also cracking down on all those who profit       from the sale of sex.              "We will hold those who are advertising — not the prostitute themselves, but       those who are advertising these services either through papers or online —       also       to criminal account," Justice Minister Peter MacKay said last July.                     Sex ads reportedly refused              Klein said Now has sought advice from one of the lawyers behind the Supreme       Court challenge.              "This is another area of the law which just makes the lives of sex workers       really difficult and of course attacks their ability to earn a living," she       said.              "But the law does say that sex workers themselves are allowed to advertise, and       our legal advisers understand that to include the publication of their ads in       our publication."              In Vancouver, sex workers are already reporting that some online advertising       services are refusing to take ads for explicit sexual services, said Kerry       Porth, a board member of Pivot Legal Aid Society in Vancouver and a former       prostitute.              "It makes it harder to work indoors if you can't actually advertise where you       are and what you're doing," she said.              Not everyone is opposed to the ban.              "We support the section of the bill that criminalizes advertising of sexual       services because of the role that advertising plays in normalizing and       entrenching racist and sexist stereotypes," Suzanne Jay of the group Asian       Women Coalition Ending Prostitution told a House of Commons committee.                     Bill comes with $20M funding              In the course of its studies of the bill, the House of Commons and Senate heard       a wide-ranging variety of opinions and perspectives from more than 100       witnesses.              Their testimony exposed a divide between those who see prostitutes as victims       and others who consider prostitution a career choice.              Though the government considers prostitution a crime against women that must be       eradicated, they seem sensitive to the distinction.              The bill was accompanied by $20 million in funding over five years for exit       strategies, a measure that was supposed to be emphasized on the day the bill       came into force.              But when the government realized that day was Dec. 6, which happened to be the       National Day for Remembrance and Action on Violence Against Women, they quietly       announced the funding a few days earlier.              Some say it's entirely appropriate for the bill to come into force on Saturday.              "I think it's tremendous it becomes law on Dec. 6," said Megan Walker, the       executive director of the London Abused Women's Centre, which works with       prostitutes among other women.              "We believe that prostitution is men's violence against women so we're happy to       see this action that's been taken."                     Funding not enough, agency says              Walker was among the dozens of witnesses who told the government the $20       million wasn't enough, though she said her agency sill hopes to get some of the       funding to hire an additional staff worker.              "Even if the government had announced $50 million across the country or       whatever amount they determined, likely people would complain, including us,       its not enough," she said.              The only way to solve prostitution is to address what leads to it, said Kate       Gibson, the executive director of the Wish Drop-in Centre Society in Vancouver,       which works with survival sex workers.              Divided evenly amongst the provinces and then amongst sex workers themselves,       $20 million would amount to $47.02 a year per sex worker, Gibson said — a       paltry sum.              "They think they are going to end something that is rooted in economics and       historical trauma," she said of the government's efforts.              "They don't want to address any of that."              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca