Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    ont.politics    |    Ontario politics    |    90,757 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 89,247 of 90,757    |
|    =?UTF-8?B?IijCrOKAv8KsKSAi?= to All    |
|    Big job boost to Halifax . . . . but at     |
|    21 Jan 15 17:45:02    |
      XPost: hfx.general, ns.general       From: Raisa@nyet.ca              Once again, it's too bad that our government is spending our tax money on       building WAR ships instead of search and rescue ships and helicopters.       We'll never get it right until we get 'the right' parties out of Ottawa.       ___________________________________________________________       National Post - John Ivison | January 21, 2015 |                     $26B shock - Canada's largest ever defence procurement handed off in       sole-source contract                     Show me a good loser and I’ll show you a loser. The old saying is doubly apt       in       defence procurement, where losing bidders always claim nepotism, corruption or       incompetence.              But accusations that the government has sole sourced a military contract even       larger than the one at the centre of the F35 fiasco may be more than just sour       grapes on the part of those frozen out.              There was genuine shock in Ottawa defence circles when an apparently routine       information session on the efforts to build a new warship fleet — Canada’s       largest-ever defence procurement project — revealed, without fanfare, that       Irving Shipbuilding in Halifax had been awarded the designation as prime       contractor on the $26-billion procurement to build up to 15 ships.              Irving had already won the right to build the ships in its Halifax yard, but       the job of prime contractor on the design phase could prove even more       lucrative, since up to 70% of the value of the vessels is in the complex combat       systems that are installed.              The role gives overall control of the management and delivery of all contracts       – the going rate for which is typically 12-15% on every dollar spent,       according       to industry insiders.              No financial details on the Canadian Surface Combatant project have been       released.              But the news that the contract had been awarded without a competitive tender       ran around the town quicker than Wee Willie Winkie in his nightgown.               Colin Kenny: The plan to replace Canada’s heavy warships may already be       going off the rails              “The price of the poker game has gone up without a competition,” said one       lobbyist. “It’s great to have a Canadian company running a 30-year effort       but       what will it cost the taxpayer?        If they’d held a competition, we could have seen five or six contenders.”              Others pointed out that the sole sourcing appeared to run contrary to the       government’s much-vaunted Defence Procurement Strategy.              It certainly seems to violate government contract regulations that say sole       sourcing is permissible “if only one person is capable of performing the       contract.”              By handing the contract to a Canadian company, it may have fulfilled one of the       procurement strategy’s goals, but it may not have gotten the best price,       critics claim.              “The government wants 15 ships but they don’t have enough money for seven       ships       – and they have even less now. Nobody tested the market,” said one       industry       source.              A senior government official at Public Works said the selection process took       place in 2011, when Irving was chosen as the lead yard for the surface       combatant vessels. He said it was made clear “by exception” that the       shipyard       was the prime contractor. “But in the umbrella agreement signed by the       shipyard, the Crown reserved the right not to make it the prime contractor. We       wanted to do an industry analysis to make sure our intended course was the       right one. It was clear to everyone that Irving was prime contractor during       the construction phase. At issue was whether it was going to be prime       contractor during the design phase.”              It certainly does not appear to have been clear to Irving that it was in line       for the prime role in the design phase, since it launched a lobbying campaign       pointing out why the shipyard building the vessels should have overall control       when it came to managing subcontractors.              Contrary to suggestions that appointing Irving without a competition would       raise the overall price, the government official said it would save money by       avoiding the cost of having two contractors, each charging a percentage fee on       every dollar spent. “It’s less risky, more efficient and likely means less       cost,” he said.              The unusual manner in which the news leaked out – via a Public Works       bureaucrat       at an information session – led to suggestions that the ministers responsible       have been blindsided.              But a spokeswoman for Diane Finley, the Public Works Minister, said the       ministerial working group responsible for military procurement was told about       Irving’s selection at its last meeting.              The senior bureaucrat at Public Works said that it was an administrative       contractual decision that did not have to get Cabinet’s blessing.              But this is a contract of unprecedented value.              To let the news slip out in the way it did is simply asking for trouble. To       the surprise of many, the rationale is that a multi-billion-dollar contract has       been awarded on the basis of a four-year-old agreement that did not explicitly       state Irving had already been chosen as prime contractor.              Yet again, questions are being asked about Canada’s defence procurement       system,       and yet again the answers lack conviction.       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^                     ============================================================================        Loyalty to the country always. Loyalty to the government when it       deserves it. ~ Mark Twain       ============================================================================              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca