XPost: can.politics, bc.politics   
   From: none@present.com   
      
   "David Johnston"  wrote in message news:mget4s$f89$1@dont-email.me...   
      
   > On 4/12/2015 4:31 PM,  wrote:   
   > > What's a "terrorist hoax"?   
      
   > To quote the relevant law:   
   >   
   > Hoax Regarding Terrorist Activity   
   >   
   > Hoax — terrorist activity   
   >   
   > 83.231 (1) Every one commits an offence who, without lawful excuse and   
   > with intent to cause any person to fear death, bodily harm, substantial   
   > damage to property or serious interference with the lawful use or   
   > operation of property,   
   >   
   > (a) conveys or causes or procures to be conveyed information that, in all   
   > the circumstances, is likely to cause a reasonable apprehension that   
   > terrorist activity is occurring or will occur, without believing the   
   > information to be true; or   
   >   
   > (b) commits an act that, in all the circumstances, is likely to cause a   
   > reasonable apprehension that terrorist activity is occurring or will   
   > occur, without believing that such activity is occurring or will occur.   
   >   
   > In other words, "phoning in a fake bomb threat"   
   >   
   > But the point is, this trivial bullshit is not going to alarm the public   
   > and thus has no political utility nor is it intended to.   
      
   Good effort; but your inclusion of words of greater than two syllables means   
   that she hasn't got a hope of understanding it.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)