Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    ont.politics    |    Ontario politics    |    90,757 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 89,631 of 90,757    |
|    HisWrightArm to All    |
|    Taking a closer look at Nigel Wright . .    |
|    15 Aug 15 17:08:04    |
      From: The Party of One - by Michael Harris                     Wrecking Ball              The Harper government's damage-control strategy ws taking shape, with Senator       Duffy as the main culprit. But the other participant in the $90,000 payoff       was a different matter.              Nigel Wright was a blue-chip political asset to the prime minister, with a       long history of involvement in Conservative Party policy and fiance going back       thirty years. *               * Wright was interested in politics even in high school. He was a       member of the Young Conservatives in university and backed Mulroney in his       1983 leadership campaign. In 1984, Wright interrupted law schools at U of T       to become a speech        writer and policy advisor to the Mulroney PMO. Wright also assisted Mike       Harris in Ontario and helped Kim Campbell to become the first female PM.        (Wright went to Onex in 1997, the same year Harper went to the NCC.)              If there was any doubt that the PMO would try to come up with a narrative to       save him from the scandal, it was quickly removed by the prime minister's       director of communications. Andrew MacDougall told the media that Nigel       Wright had "the full        confidence of the prime minister" and "he will not resign."              MacDougall attempted to rag the puck by declaring that the PMO was cooperating       with a probe by Parliamentary Ethics Commissioner Mary Dawson. If the       Conservatives could give the impression that something was being done about       the extraordinary deal        between the prime minister's chief of staff and his celebrity senator, the       brewing scandal might slip behind the fog banks of yesterday's news.              It was not Mary Dawson's first dealing with Nigel Wright. . . .              When Wright had taken the top job in the PMO, Dawson had helped devise the       "ethical wall" designed to protect him from conflicts between his role in the       PMO and his past life as a Bay Street whiz kid at Onex Corporation. The       ethical wall would be        administered by the deputy chief of staff to the prime minister. Then in       2012, Dawson got a chance to assess the height and thickness of Wright's       ethical wall.              It became public that Barrick Gold, founded by Peter Munk, had lobbied Wright       three times in May about international relations and international trade.        Wright was personal friends with both Munk and his son Anthony who had worked       with Wright at Onex.        The ties were close. Wright was godfather to Anthony's son.              The calls were of interest because Barrick was the world's largest gold mining       company. It had an $8.5 billion investment in the troubled Pascua Lama mine       in the Andes, straddling the border of Chile and Argentina. The project came       to a grinding halt        in Chile in April 2013 when Chile's environmental regulator stopped       construction of the mine on its side of the border, citing serious       environmental violations affecting the water supply of the indigenous Diaguita       Indian community living below the site.              For as long as anyone could remember, the Indians had taken their water       directly from their glacier-fed river. Now toxic chemicals, including arsenic       and sulfates, were flowing into the headwaters, causing health problems.        Barrick was fined $16.4        million after authorities confirmed that the company had not told the full       truth when reporting environmental failures in their operation. Diaguita       protesters held up signs that didn't enhance Canada's image on the evening       news: "Canada: What's        HARPERing here?" and "Harper go home."              Foreign affairs minister John Baird vigorously defended Wright over conflict       allegations arising out of the calls from Barrick Gold. The calls were made       in May 2012, shortly after Harper blocked a resolution on Argentina's claim to       the Falkland Islands        at the Summit of the Americas in Colombia.              Canadian mining companies were concerned this move would make it harder for       them to obtain permits from the Argentinian government, and Barrick planned to       continue construction on the Argentinian side of Pascua Lama.              According to Baird, Wright listened to Barrick's concerns, said nothing, and       directed the matter 'to the proper officials'. Since Barrick called Wright on       May 14, 25, and 29, one wonders if the "proper officials" were on a long lunch.              Dawson discontinued her examination of a possible conflict of interest for       Wright over Barrick's contacts with him. As she often does, she did this       without issuing a notice, ruling or report. When CP reporter, Joan Bryden,       pressed Dawson on the        disposition of the file, the commissioner told her that she was satisfied       there had been no violation on Wright's part of the Conflict of Interest Act.        It was 'transparency and accountability' - Harper-style.              The PMO claimed vindication. Andrew MacDougall issued a statement: "As we       have said all along, Mr Wright conducted himself properly and in accordance       with the rules."              NDP ethics critic Charlie Angus wasn't buying it. "It's who you know in the       PMO, and this is what the prime minister said he was going to change; this is       the culture that he said was going to get cleaned up."               There were good reasons for the political opposition and the public to worry       about the shadowy interface between big business and government. Access to       the highest legislative levels is a huge priority for companies like Barrick,       and their executives        were not shy about bringing in the politicians when they had a problem.              That's exactly how Barrick recovered most of its losses from investing in       asset-backed commercial paper (ABCP) that was being sold by Canada's chartered       banks by the late 1980s. Barrick was advised by CIBC World Markets that their       $66-million investment        was safe in a third-party ABCP trust called Ironstone.              But when it turned out that the investment was freighted with a lot of toxic       subprime mortgage debt, the big banks could not protect all investors and       Barrick lost its money. Barrick sued the CIBC, and after years of legal       wrangling, got some        satisfaction in May 2008. But it didn't happen before a call went out from       finance minister, Jim Flaherty, to the bank.               As Bruce Livesey wrote in his book 'Thieves of Bay Street', "Federal finance       minister Jum Flaherty had stepped in and telephoned senior executives at the       bank, pressing them to return Barrick's cash. CIBC reluctantly handed over       $49 million to settle        the matter."                     [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca