Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    ont.politics    |    Ontario politics    |    90,757 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 89,888 of 90,757    |
|    brewnoser2@gmail.com to All    |
|    Canada's 'supply management' vs America'    |
|    16 Jun 18 14:43:57    |
              Important to know what we're talking about - even if the loudest voices are       from the right wing stupids. Note, especially, the last two paragraphs - and       then you realize just how much of a hypocrite - on top of being a liar - Trump       is.       _______________________________       CBC News · Posted: Jun 16, 2018              How Canada's supply management system works              It's been blamed for inflating food prices - but a lot of American producers       wish they had something like it                     Canada's system of supply management has been the target of heated political       debate for the better part of half a century — but very few Canadians       outside of the affected farm sectors actually understand how it works, or who       foots the bill for        stabilizing farmers' incomes.              Supply management is a system that allows specific commodity sectors —       dairy, poultry and eggs — to limit the supply of their products to what       Canadians are expected to consume in order to ensure predictable, stable       prices.              While the federal government has played a role in supporting agricultural       pricing policies for more than a century, the current system of supply       management traces its origins to the 1960s — a period of overproduction due       to technological advances that        resulted in low prices for farmers.              While the federal government was keen to support farmers' incomes — and the       votes that come with them — direct financial supports became too heavy a       burden for the federal treasury to bear.              Bruce Muirhead, a historian at the University of Waterloo who has written       extensively about supply management, said the government of the day felt that       $50-55 million in annual support payments "would seriously upset the balance       of the budget."              "This is one of the reasons we moved to a supply-managed system — government       wanted to make farming sustainable on its own," Muirhead writes in his       research paper 'Crying Over Spilt Milk'.              The United States, in contrast, has largely maintained support for the farming       sector through subsidies. So Americans foot the bill for farm supports       indirectly, through the taxes they pay, while Canadians pay for those supports       directly, through higher        prices for supply-managed products.              According to a Library of Parliament study of supply management, the system       rests on three pillars: production control, pricing mechanisms and import       control.              First pillar: quotas              Under supply management, a national marketing agency determines production       amounts for each commodity and then sets production quotas for each province.              In order to sell their products, a farmer must hold a quota — basically a       license to produce up to a set amount. The quota prevent market gluts that       would cause prices to dip and disrupt farm incomes.              As of 2015, there were just over 16,000 quota holders in Canada — most of       them dairy farmers in Ontario and Quebec. The quotas initially were given       away for free but quickly became quite valuable; Canada's total quota is now       valued at over $32 billion.              Muirhead told CBC News that while U.S. President Donald Trump has pushed       Canada to dismantle the system to help U.S. farmers, many dairy farmers south       of the border look at Canada's system of supply management with envy.              He said Wisconsin farmers in particular are beset by production issues that       have caused prices to tank; the state has more cows than all of Canada and       produces more milk.              "Those guys are massively in favour of supply management. It would stabilize       their industry," he said.                     Second pillar: minimum prices              Supply-managed producers are guaranteed a minimum price for their products.       Through provincial marketing boards, farmers negotiate minimum "farm gate       prices" with processors.              Critics maintain that Canadians pay too much for supply-managed products       because the system inflates prices beyond what an open market would impose in       order to keep farmers afloat.              But not everyone agrees — and the research is by no means unanimous in its       conclusions.              In 2014, a Nielsen Company study commissioned by the Dairy Farmers of Canada       showed that the price of Canadian dairy products compared favourably with       prices in other countries.              The Montreal Economic Institute, a centre-right think tank, maintains that       millions of Canadians are paying artificially high prices to benefit a few       thousand farmers. A recent University of Manitoba study concluded that supply       management costs wealthy        families an average of $554 a year, with lower income families facing an       average bill of more than $339 a year as a result of the policy.              "Supply management hurts all 35 million Canadian consumers by forcing them to       pay consistently more for milk, chicken and eggs, as well as for other       products that use these foodstuffs as ingredients," the institute wrote in a       recent report on the matter.        "Importantly, supply management disproportionately hurts poor Canadians."              Former Conservative leadership candidate Maxime Bernier, who nearly bested       Andrew Scheer in the party's leadership contest last year, has become one of       the country's most vocal opponents of supply management.              "The worst aspect of supply management, however, isn't that all Canadians who       buy these products must pay more. It's that the poor, and households with       children, are affected the most," Bernier wrote in a chapter from his       forthcoming book.              "It should be clear that this is a transfer of wealth from the poorest to some       of the richest in our society. Farming families working under supply       management are indeed far richer than most Canadian families. A verage       after-tax income of all households        in Canada is $69,100. By comparison, the average dairy farming household       income is $147,800, and the number is $180,400 for poultry-farming households."              But dairy farmers point to retail prices for milk in jurisdictions that have       deregulated their dairy industries, like the United Kingdom and Australia, as       proof that supply management strikes the right balance.              In Australia, for example, prices for milk in the major cities rose 27 cents       per litre in the three years after deregulation.              In New Zealand, the largest dairy exporting country in the world, milk prices       are higher than they are here in Canada.                     Third pillar: high tariffs              The third pillar of supply management is the imposition of high tariffs on       foreign imports, a policy that makes these goods prohibitively expensive for       Canadians, leaving domestic supply as virtually the only option for consumers.                     [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca