Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    ont.politics    |    Ontario politics    |    90,757 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 89,929 of 90,757    |
|    brewnoser2@gmail.com to All    |
|    Wilson-Raybould - not so much 'boom' as     |
|    27 Feb 19 16:50:22    |
              If you're listening to her testimony before the Commons justice committee,       you're hearing Jody Wilson-Raybould do some major dodging of questions - even       though she's been reminded by several members that she has been given complete       freedom by the        government and legal types that she can speak openly on her complaints.              I'm hearing her dodge the question of why she did not resign after her       'demotion' to Veterans Affairs.              I'm hearing that discussions between the office of the Director of Public       Prosecutions can legally and commonly continue even after a DPP has ruled       against offering a Deferred Prosecution Agreement to an accused.              I'm hearing that once she decided not to approve a DPA, the line had been       drawn in the sand and "as Attorney General I had the final say and did not       appreciate any further overtures from the PM's office". She decided to term       it "political interference        with the Attorney General".              When asked if she - in general terms - approved of DPAs as a method of process       in negotiations with an accused - she refused to answer. "I feel that it's       not pertinent to this issue." That drew a few pregnant pauses - and       challenges from several        members.              IOW - this seems to be an issue of a very stubborn Attorney General deciding       at a point that she'd made her decision "as Attorney General" and that she       wasn't going to entertain any more overtures and conversations to discuss the       ramifications of her        decision - even if those continued conversations were perfectly common and       legal. She decided these common overtures were "interference with her       position as Attorney General".              I think we're going to see her 'ethical stance against political interference'       is going to be torn apart quite effectively by those with legal minds and this       will be relegated to another tempest-in-a-teapot created by a pretty testy       individual who got        demoted and didn't appreciate it.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca