She was never qualified to be Attorney-General.  No one with just 3 years of   
   experience as a lawyer would be.   
      
   Trudeau appointed her because of his pervasive and extreme accommodation of   
   the native people in this country.  Wilson-Raybould's experience with the law   
   was almost entirely involved with gaining more rights for the indigenous   
   communities.     
      
   She is known for having a temper, being extremely stubborn, and through her   
   own testimony - overly impressed and self-important with her role as Attorney   
   General . . . no one dares challenge a decision that she has made.   
      
   A full inquiry would bring out the facts and it would reveal that the   
   overtures and conversations that others in the PM's office tried to have with   
   her - to protect the many, many jobs at SNC-Lavalin - fell on dear, stubborn,   
   and self-righteous ears.   
   And also that those conversations and entreaties were totally permissible,   
   legal and common in deciding for or against a DPA.  She admitted in her own   
   testimony that they were not illegal.   
      
   And as to "veiled threats" that she's accusing the PMO of? . . .  how does   
   this sound to the average Candadian ear? . . .   
      
   “Are you politically interfering with my role / my decision as the AG? I   
   would strongly advise against it.”   
      
   She even had the temerity to bring in 'native reconciliation' into the   
   conversation - sending the signal to aboriginals across the country that   
   Trudeau was breaking his promise to them by demoting her.   
      
   She never was Attorney-General material.  That was Trudeau's biggest - and   
   only mistake in his interactions with her.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)