Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    ont.politics    |    Ontario politics    |    90,757 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 89,984 of 90,757    |
|    brewnoser2@gmail.com to All    |
|    Ontario loses its carbon tax appeal    |
|    28 Jun 19 13:01:34    |
      Like Saskatchewan lost theirs. When will they start to think about the       quality of their air and water and soil - and especially their extreme weather       events - instead of how much money they can make extracting and exporting       bitumen to countries like        China?              The voters of these money-driven provinces are going to have to get real one       day.       It may be the day they're flooded out of their homes, burned out by wildfires,       or unable to drink water from their taps because of an industry's       contamination.              Some day maybe they won't be so eager to trade their homes and lives for money.       ________________________________       Updated: June 28, 2019 3:33 pm              Ontario court rules federal government’s carbon-pricing law is constitutional              TORONTO – Ontario’s top court has ruled the federal government’s carbon       pricing system is constitutionally sound and has the critical purpose of       fighting climate change.              A panel of the Ontario Court of Appeal says in a split decision that       Parliament has the jurisdiction to legislate in relation to matters of       “national concern.”              Doug Ford's Ontario’s Progressive Conservative government had argued the       federal carbon pricing scheme is a violation of the Constitution because it       allows the federal government to intrude on provincial jurisdiction.              But the majority of the Appeal Court rejected Ontario’s contention that the       carbon levy is an illegal tax.              In a dissenting opinion, Justice Grant Huscroft disagreed that climate change       amounts to an “emergency case” and warned against allowing rhetoric to       colour the constitutional analysis.              The Saskatchewan Court of Appeal issued a similar split decision last month in       favour of the federal government, which that province intends to challenge in       the Supreme Court of Canada.              Federal Environment Minister Catherine McKenna says today’s ruling is good       news for everyone who believes the need for climate action is urgent.              She adds it’s unfortunate that Conservative premiers continue to waste       taxpayer dollars fighting climate action in court rather than taking real       action.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca