Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    ont.politics    |    Ontario politics    |    90,757 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 90,477 of 90,757    |
|    brewnoser to All    |
|    O'Toole's Conservatives: 'No climate cha    |
|    20 Mar 21 10:59:13    |
      From: brewnoser2@gmail.com              They should just rename their party to Dying Dinosaurs. 'Conservatives' is       much too progressive.       __________________________________       CBC News · Posted: Mar 20, 2021              Conservative delegates reject adding 'climate change is real' to the policy       book              Conservative delegates at the party's policy convention have voted to reject       adding green-friendly statements to the policy book — including a line that       would have stated the party believes "climate change is real" and is "willing       to act."              The Portneuf—Jacques—Cartier riding in Quebec, which proposed the policy       change, also asked delegates to recognize that "Canadian businesses classified       as highly polluting need to take more responsibility" and "reduce their GHG       emissions."              Delegates issued a rebuke to climate-minded Conservatives and rejected the       policy shift by a margin of 54 per cent to 46. In fact, it was one of only       four policy proposals or modifications on a list of 50 pitched by electoral       riding associations (EDAs)        that were rejected by the delegates.              While delegates from each of the Atlantic provinces and Quebec embraced the       "climate change is real" proposal — 70 per cent of delegates from New       Brunswick and Quebec were onside with it — those from every other province       and the territories voted        against the change.              In B.C., the "no" side had just a two-point edge, while the vote was much more       lopsided in Saskatchewan (73 per cent against), the territories (69 per cent       opposed), Alberta (62 per cent opposed) and Ontario (58 per cent opposed).              A double majority of delegates — a majority of delegates overall and the       majority of delegates in the majority of provinces — must agree to an       official policy change.              The clear rejection came hours after Conservative Leader Erin O'Toole urged       party members to embrace change or risk losing again to Prime Minister Justin       Trudeau and the Liberals in the next election.              O'Toole said that if party members are serious about winning, they must       embrace new ideas — even if they go against party orthodoxy.              O'Toole told delegates the party "cannot ignore the reality of climate change"       and that the debate "is over."              "We must also recognize that Canadians expect us to have a real plan for the       environment. We need to boldly reclaim the environment as an area where       Conservatives are leaders," he said.              There was a fierce debate over this policy change during the policy convention       Friday, with a clear split in the party ranks over how far the Conservatives       should go in addressing climate change.              Some delegates embraced a shift in posture, saying they want Canada to adopt       green technology while still supporting extractive industries like the oil and       gas sector. Others called the proposal an unnecessary gesture to appease       climate activists.              "I'm not sure why it's necessary for the Conservative Party to declare climate       change is real," one delegate from Scarborough-Centre said.              "The way this section is worded befuddles the issue and may cost us some       support. Conservatives need to lead with clarity, focus and intelligent       solutions, not buzzwords."              Another delegate, from Perth—Wellington in Ontario, said environmental       policy should not be focused on driving down greenhouse gas emissions.              "It's not the only pollutant that we have to worry about," he said. "I'm       opposed to this amendment because it unfairly centres on greenhouse gas       emissions."                     Delegates also reject medical assistance in dying              Delegates also rejected a modification to the policy book that would have       changed the party's stance on medical assistance in dying — swapping the       statement that the party would not support any legislation that would       "legalize euthanasia or assisted        suicide" for one that says it would oppose "the extension of euthanasia and       assisted suicide" to minors and people living with "psychological suffering."              By a 55-44 vote, delegates voted to keep the status quo.              This policy modification may have been rejected because delegates also voted       for a similarly worded resolution that reaffirms the party "opposes euthanasia       and assisted suicide" and will stand against any expansions of the current       law. The federal        government recently extended access to medical assistance in dying with Bill       C-7.              Delegates also voted down proposals that would have scrubbed a Conservative       policy position backing a national missing persons' registry.              They also voted to maintain their stance on section 13 of the Canadian Human       Rights Act.              That section — which is no longer in force, having been repealed by a       Conservative private member's bill in 2014 — prohibited online       communications which were "likely to expose a person or persons to hatred or       contempt" on the basis of a prohibited        ground of discrimination, such as race, national or ethic origin, colour or       religion. Complainants could bring their cases to the Canadian Human Rights       Commission.              This section of the act was loathed by free speech advocates, who said it went       too far in policing online content.       __________________________________________              In summary, the Conservatives still stand for:       - no acceptance of climate change - or action to tackle it       - against medically-assisted dying       - maintain right to post online communications which were "likely to expose a       person or persons to hatred or contempt" based race, national or ethic origin,       colour or religion              Fill your boots, haters - THIS is the party for you on election day!              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca