Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 256  |
|  "Felix Miata mrmazda@earthlink.net to All  |
|  Re: Os/2 help  |
|  27 Apr 15 14:36:21  |
 pusa.dynip.com@returns.groups.yahoo.com wpusa.dynip.com -0400 usa.dynip.com@returns.groups.yahoo.com ullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com) (98.139.165.60) 2015 14:36:27 -0400 27 Apr 2015 18:36:23 -0000 27 Apr 2015 18:36:23 -0000 (98.139.245.164) SeaMonkey/2.33.1 ed0741ced74d818214b180fab97e23350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c r@yahoogroups.com Phil Parker composed on 2015-04-26 23:20 (UTC-0500): > There are only two things different from CRTs with contemporary LCDs. One is > that things work best if you set the display resolution to exactly the > native resolution of the LCD. That's the theory, and typically the practice. The higher the resolution, the higher the technical quality. But with higher resolution, software assumptions can break down for individual users. The net effect is that user experience can be degraded because onscreen objects, text in particular, become smaller, reducing effective legibility and inducing eyestrain and backstrain (from leaning forward, often unconsciously). Personalization of software to compensate (make things bigger) may or may not be adequate. > The other is to set the refresh rate to 60 Hz and no more. LCDs > tend not to like rates any higher at all. Most LCDs support all VESA modes. Among them are usually 75 in addition to 60, at least for 1024x768 and lower. Whether there's any user benefit to using 75 instead of 60 is another matter. I've never been able to detect any. -- "The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation) Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks! Felix Miata *** http://fm.no-ip.com/ ------------------------------------ Posted by: Felix Miata |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]