home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

 Message 265 
 "Yahoo finalphilthoughts@yahoo.com to All 
 Re: Os/2 help 
 01 May 15 17:42:52 
 
pusa.dynip.com@returns.groups.yahoo.com
wpusa.dynip.com
-0400
usa.dynip.com@returns.groups.yahoo.com
.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com) (98.139.165.165)
2015 17:47:46 -0400
01 May 2015 21:47:41 -0000
01 May 2015 21:47:41 -0000
(98.139.245.163)
01 May 2015 21:47:41 -0000
May 2015 21:47:41 -0000
21:47:41 -0000
(98.138.215.82)
May 2015 21:45:40 -0000
NNFMP; 01 May 2015 21:42:55 -0000
NNFMP; 01 May 2015 21:42:55 -0000
NNFMP; 01 May 2015 21:42:54 -0000
2015 21:42:54 -0000
r@yahoogroups.com
--Apple-Mail-2CE0A885-5A19-495F-9FFB-122ED4CC79FE
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Thanks. I've got it running now at 1024 @ 60Hz, connected from my laptop to=
 a 36" tv and it's doing fine, very readable. Btw, I've loaded Describe 5 u=
nder Warp 4 and it's a really great set up. I'm writing final exams with it=
 and printing to my old Laserjet 4M+.


Sent from the Planet Xrgklpr


> On A=
pr 29, 2015, at 1:16 PM, Stephan Bucher stephan.bucher@bioconsult.ch [os2us=
er]  wrote:
> 
> It will not, but OS/2 always boot=
s at 640x480 during the first phase. 
> You can always press Alt-F1 when "O=
S/2" appears in the top left corner 
> and then choose VGA and other option=
s from a menu. If you select VGA, 
> you need to reinstall SNAP. You can bo=
ot to text mode that way and 
> configure SNAP. The problem is that SNAP ca=
n't handle the resolution of 
> wide screens; up to 1280x1024 is fine.
> 
>=
 On 29.04.2015 05:21, Yahoo finalphilthoughts@yahoo.com [os2user] wrote:
> =
> Ok, thanks. One other video question for you Warp experts: I have 
> > ma=
naged to get Warp 4 on a box and am displaying it on a 36" tv. It is 
> > s=
et to 480. If I raise it to 800x600, which will require a reboot to 
> > ta=
ke effect, will it auto revert back so I still have a display if for 
> > s=
ome reason it doesn't like the higher resolution?
> >
> > Sent from the Pla=
net Xrgklpr
> >
> > On Apr 27, 2015, at 1:36 PM, Felix Miata mrmazda@earthl=
ink.net 
> >  [os2user]  > > wrote:
> >
> >> Phil Parker comp=
osed on 2015-04-26 23:20 (UTC-0500):
> >>
> >> > There are only two things =
different from CRTs with contemporary 
> >> LCDs. One is
> >> > that things=
 work best if you set the display resolution to exactly the
> >> > native r=
esolution of the LCD.
> >>
> >> That's the theory, and typically the practi=
ce. The higher the 
> >> resolution, the
> >> higher the technical quality.=


> >>
> >> But with higher resolution, software assumptions can break down =
for
> >> individual users. The net effect is that user experience can be de=
graded
> >> because onscreen objects, text in particular, become smaller, r=
educing
> >> effective legibility and inducing eyestrain and backstrain (fr=
om leaning
> >> forward, often unconsciously). Personalization of software =
to compensate
> >> (make things bigger) may or may not be adequate.
> >>
> =
>> > The other is to set the refresh rate to 60 Hz and no more. LCDs
> >> >=
 tend not to like rates any higher at all.
> >>
> >> Most LCDs support all =
VESA modes. Among them are usually 75 in 
> >> addition to
> >> 60, at leas=
t for 1024x768 and lower. Whether there's any user benefit to
> >> using 75=
 instead of 60 is another matter. I've never been able to 
> >> detect any.=


> >> -- 
> >> "The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant
> =
>> words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation)
> >>
> >>=
 Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks!
> >>
> >> Felix Miata =
*** http://fm.no-ip.com/
> >>
> > 
> >
> > No virus found in this message.
=
> > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
> > Version: 2015.0.5=
941 / Virus Database: 4339/9654 - Release Date: 04/29/15
> >
> 
> [Non-text=
 portions of this message have been removed]
> 
> 

--Apple-Mail-2CE0A885-5A19-495F-9FFB-122ED4CC79FE
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit








        







Thanks. I've got it running now at 1024 @ 60Hz, connected from my laptop to a 36" tv and it's doing fine, very readable. Btw, I've loaded Describe 5 under Warp 4 and it's a really great set up. I'm writing final exams with it and printing to my old Laserjet 4M+.

Sent from the Planet Xrgklpr

On Apr 29, 2015, at 1:16 PM, Stephan Bucher stephan.bucher@bioconsult.ch [os2user] <os2user@y hoogroups.com> wrote:

 

It will not, but OS/2 always boots at 640x480 during the first phase.
You can always press Alt-F1 when "OS/2" appears in the top left corner
and then choose VGA and other options from a menu. If you select VGA,
you need to reinstall SNAP. You can boot to text mode that way and
configure SNAP. The problem is that SNAP can't handle the resolution of
wide screens; up to 1280x1024 is fine.

On 29.04.2015 05:21, Yahoo finalphilthoughts@yahoo.com [os2user] wrote:
> Ok, thanks. One other video question for you Warp experts: I have
> managed to get Warp 4 on a box and am displaying it on a 36" tv. It is
> set to 480. If I raise it to 800x600, which will require a reboot to
> take effect, will it auto revert back so I still have a display if for
> some reason it doesn't like the higher resolution?
>
> Sent from the Planet Xrgklpr
>
> On Apr 27, 2015, at 1:36 PM, Felix Miata mrmazda@earthlink.net
> <mailto:mrmazda@e rthlink.net> [os2user] <os2user@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:os2user yahoogroups.com>> wrote:
>
>> Phil Parker composed on 2015-04-26 23:20 (UTC-0500):
>>
>> > There are only two things different from CRTs with contemporary
>> LCDs. One is
>> > that things work best if you set the display resolution to exactly the
>> > native resolution of the LCD.
>>
>> That's the theory, and typically the practice. The higher the
>> resolution, the
>> higher the technical quality.
>>
>> But with higher resolution, software assumptions can break down for
>> individual users. The net effect is that user experience can be degraded
>> because onscreen objects, text in particular, become smaller, reducing
>> effective legibility and inducing eyestrain and backstrain (from leaning
>> forward, often unconsciously). Personalization of software to compensate
>> (make things bigger) may or may not be adequate.
>>
>> > The other is to set the refresh rate to 60 Hz and no more. LCDs
>> > tend not to like rates any higher at all.
>>
>> Most LCDs support all VESA modes. Among them are usually 75 in
>> addition to
>> 60, at least for 1024x768 and lower. Whether there's any user benefit to
>> using 75 instead of 60 is another matter. I've never been able to
>> detect any.
>> --
>> "The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant
>> words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation)
>>
>> Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks!
>>
>> Felix Miata *** http://f .no-ip.com/
>>
>
>
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
> Version: 2015.0.5941 / Virus Database: 4339/9654 - Release Date: 04/29/15
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



__._,_.___

Posted by: Yahoo <finalphilthoughts@yahoo.com>



__,_._,___
--Apple-Mail-2CE0A885-5A19-495F-9FFB-122ED4CC79FE-- --- * Origin: Waldo's Place USA Internet Gateway (1:3634/1000)

<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca