Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 589  |
|  Wilfred van Velzen to Dr. What  |
|  Re: Re^2: Still there?  |
|  10 Apr 24 15:30:14  |
 TID: FMail-lnx64 2.3.2.0-B20240409 RFC-X-No-Archive: Yes TZUTC: 0200 CHRS: CP850 2 PID: GED+LNX 1.1.5-b20240306 MSGID: 2:280/464 66169467 REPLY: 1:342/200 3ddeacdd Hi Dr., On 2024-04-10 05:38:44, you wrote to me: WvV>> (Your real name is broken!) DW> No. My real name is fine. The sysop of this BBS has his echos configured DW> incorrectly. You can't blame it all on the sysop. You could sign your messages with your realname. WvV>> That's an opinion! ;) WvV>> I liked Turbo C ... DW> Yup. That's an opinion. But good luck finding a good C compiler for CP/M DW> 2.2. I don't know anything about CP/M. ;) DW> Needless to say, Turbo Pascal was wonderful in those days. Turbo C DW> didn't come out until MUCH later. Then you must be really old! ;-) I started (professionally) with Turbo C on the PC under DOS, I think on a 386... WvV>> I highly doubt Mystic has a Pascal compiler build into it. So it WvV>> probably has support for executables. So it doesn't matter what WvV>> language they are written in. DW> No, that's not correct. I don't know if it has a compiler "built in", but I DW> know that you wrote your code and use some sort of "compiler" to build it. DW> It's been a while. Nicholas Boel explained it... Bye, Wilfred. --- FMail-lnx64 2.3.2.0-B20240409 * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464) SEEN-BY: 15/0 90/1 103/705 106/201 124/5016 128/260 129/305 135/220 SEEN-BY: 135/225 153/757 7715 154/10 30 203/0 218/700 221/0 226/30 SEEN-BY: 227/114 229/110 112 113 206 307 317 400 426 428 470 550 616 SEEN-BY: 229/664 700 240/1120 5832 266/512 280/464 5003 282/1038 291/111 SEEN-BY: 292/854 8125 301/1 320/219 322/757 341/66 234 342/200 396/45 SEEN-BY: 423/120 460/58 256 1124 5858 467/888 633/280 712/848 770/1 SEEN-BY: 5020/400 5054/30 5075/35 PATH: 280/464 460/58 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]