XPost: nj.politics, ny.politics, nyc.politics   
   XPost: or.politics, pa.politics, seattle.politics   
   XPost: tx.politics   
      
   In nj.politics "Bill Bonde ( the oblique allusion in lieu of the frontal   
   attack )"  wrote:   
   >   
   > I'm not claiming that Saddam was involved in 9/11. I don't know whether   
   > he was or not. I know he didn't want to make his links to al Qaeda all   
   > that obvious. In any case, you have no evidence that Saudi Arabia was   
   > involved in 9/11, yet you claim just because bin Laden chose to use   
   > mostly Saudis that that must be the case. Of course that defines logic   
   > since bin Laden hates the Saudi government and wants to use Saudis to   
   > cause problems between that government and the US.   
      
   Bush had no evidence that Saddam was planning to attack United States   
   interests, yet we now have another Vietnam in Iraq.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)