XPost: phl.media   
   From: kybyrd@pobox.upenn.edu   
      
   On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 14:57:45 GMT, nms  wrote:   
   >   
   >"Karen Y Byrd"  wrote in message   
   >news:slrnfauhso.m8e.kybyrd@pobox.upenn.edu...   
   >> On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 10:54:37 GMT, nms  wrote:   
   >>>as if we didn't have enough of a nightmare.. This is going to make the   
   >>>boom   
   >>>for housing downtown go past off the charts lol .   
   >>   
   >> You don't know what you're talking about.   
   >>   
   >>> not one person they are   
   >>>looking for but at least four!   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> Clearly you don't remember the other  Center City serial rapist   
   >> who killed Shannon Schieber in 1998(almost 10 years ago)   
   >> who was locally active starting in 1997 until he left here for   
   >> Colorado where he was caught for another series of rapes   
   >> out there in 2002.   
   >>   
   >> What he did didn't dampen new housing in CC and near CC. Quite the   
   >> contrary,   
   >> it's only increased all through the 00s.   
   >   
   >The problem is now I got to tell as many people as I can about pollution.   
      
   But it turns a lot of people off in  time because you   
   segue EVERYTHING with/ into pollution. You start threads about   
   some other topic which ALWAYS leads to some comment about pollution   
   because it's *your* pet project. Your "cause" doesn't resonant   
   with with some others so they are either idiots, in denial(your   
   description of me) or something else in your opinion.   
      
   Like this original thread. You bring up the fact that local   
   women may have to deal   
   with another rapist/ sexual predator like they did in the late   
   90s. Fine. No problem there! BUT almost immediately you   
   launched into the comment above about pollution which most people   
   will never see as having anything to do with some a-hole   
   running around jumping women.   
      
   > I   
   >have no reason to make things up.   
   > I wasn't protected and I want others to   
   >know the implications of air that seldom reaches good. You have any   
   >understanding about quality of life issues? If you do, you would know there   
   >is much more chances to find better things in good air.   
      
   The bigger issue is whether people have enough money to live on. That alone   
   will mitigate just about every issue wrt quality of life.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)