XPost: phl.media
From: mcs@yahoo.com
I didn't mean to say no matter what they did
One can draw a map and remove all people who smoke and take drugs and are
overly obese and you would still see the states that get more green house
gas and people who reside near pollution o get sick more and are in much
worse respiratory illness at least at most more ill in a vast array of
different illnesses. When they test like that, let me know. Do you kno Karen
I have a link where it say pollution is one of the biggest killers of man on
the planet?This is also cause of concern since we seldom ever test people
correlated to pollution levels.especially in the US.
"Karen Y Byrd" wrote in message
news:slrnfkompf.57h.kybyrd@pobox.upenn.edu...
> On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 17:28:14 GMT, mcs wrote:
>
>>stop blaming air quality?
>
> Yes, stop blaming air quality for everything that happens
> to people healthwise. Trying to do so is you, once again,
> not doing the obvious: not factoring in what people
> actually do, lifestyle-wise, that affects them ultimately
> in how long they live and what kind of health they enjoy.
>
> Do you honestly think it's an accident that I have the
> kind of health that you can only dream of having although
> we grew up within 10-15 miles of each other? It's not
> just my genes(which, of course, help) but it's the lifestyle
> decisions that I made when I was young that are paying off
> for me now. Decisions I made when I was a teenager and
> in my 20s.
>
> Look, everytime I see a young person smoking I want to yank
> the cigarette out of their hand! I mean what excuse do
> they have for smoking NOW? It's stupid. You'd want to
> blame the air on the cancer or heart disease, etc they
> will likely have in 20/30 years. I'd blame the obvious:
> their DUMB decision to use tobacco when they never, ever
> needed to.
>
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
