XPost: pa.politics, pa.environment   
   From: nospam@verizon.net   
      
   "mcs"  wrote in message   
   news:yj9Sj.6266$WS1.3985@trndny04...   
   >   
   >   
   > --   
   > the goal when communicating is to rationzlize existence with truth and   
   > facts and what is right coupled with getting what we desire (which might   
   > not always be what is right)   
      
   First, let's deal with facts.  Is Philly in the top ten of polluted cities?   
   Yesterday, a news report showed Pittsburgh with the highest soot content in   
   the U.S.A.  That's higher than Los Angeles.  Even still, there are different   
   ratings such as "Ozone Action Days".  Which Pittsburgh was not among the top   
   ten.   
      
   > Facts are often hidden so rich control options   
   > Sometimes feelings are not accurate and sometimes they are. Lets learn to   
   > do better based on truth, honesty and facts and the desire to do good   
   > "imho15147"  wrote in message   
   > news:OsHRj.13290$E77.6666@trnddc05...   
   >>   
   >> "mcs"  wrote in message   
   >> news:IazRj.1118$Bd1.364@trndny09...   
   >>> philly and pa have high pollution and asthma numbers and read this   
   >>>   
   >>> just go to airnow.org to compare how your family is being harmed   
   >>> especially in Philly and maybe tell me why you are not concerned?   
   >>   
   >> Do you wish to live in the stone age?   
   >>  do you like most asthma and respiratory disease and probably commercials   
   >> for health care and more practically ever illness without knowing why?   
   >> No electric service, therefore no coal burning electric plants.   
   >   
   > Look If they want to burn coal find a safer way to do it or limit other   
   > burning fossil fuel   
      
   Easier said than done.  Part of it is economics itself.  As we now see, the   
   burning of gasoline is becoming less economical and alternatives such as   
   ethynol are becoming the choice.   
      
   >to areas that get more pollution and coal to equalize the dangers then fine   
   >but its not even assumed its a problem let alone discussing the alternative   
   >which is sickening and disgusting..,   
      
   There are finite options of energy and economics comes into play.  Would you   
   prefer nucleur energy?  Then what about the storage of spent plutonium rods?   
   Solar, what about the number of sunny days in Philly.  Wind turbines,   
   someone will complain about spoiling the view.  In all, there are issues   
   with all forms of energy.   
      
   >This is not brain science. Instead we got people shooting everyone, getting   
   >sicker faster, driving faster, without work and thats better?   
      
   Shootings have little if anything to do with pollution   
      
   >> No automobiles, therefore riding horse and buggy.   
   >   
   > ok its either or, right? Not   
   >>   
   >> All you ever post on is crime and pollution.  You need to move to a rural   
   >> area if you don't want the conveniences of urban life.   
   > the problem of course is this is the problems thru out the world. The   
   > people who control the media and energy don't want changes . There are   
   > many cities with almost the same amount of people who don't get this   
   > pollution or the dangers. Now assume Philly and NE are getting more, maybe   
   > the politicians should  do more to give our area more clean air by trading   
   > energy and making more greener energy solutions so people here have a   
   > chance even if its the wind direction that keeps us more polluted.  I say   
   > they are getting poisoned. and its getting worse and politicians need to   
   > do more to get people clean air like in other cities.   
   > .   
   >>   
   >> imho15147   
   >>   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)