Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    phx.general    |    Pheonix general chat    |    3,579 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,900 of 3,579    |
|    Michelle Steiner to All    |
|    Conservapedia vs. Wikipedia    |
|    26 Feb 07 22:20:04    |
      XPost: az.general       From: michelle@michelle.org              conservapedia.com offers itself as a conservative and Christian       alternative to wikipedia.com. There are a number of differences between       the two:              Wikipedia is open, with all points of view being able to be expressed.       Conservapedia is closed; there's no option to register, so only those       blessed by the management (who, by the way, is Phyllis Schlafly's son)       can make any entries or edit or append to any existing entries.              Among Conservapedia's complaints about Wikipedia are that articles in       Wikipedia use British spelling (e.g., colour and labour) instead of       American spelling, and that some articles use CE and BCE instead of AD       and BC.              It is very apparent that the management of Conservapedia does not       understand the difference between "Conservative" and "Christian". But       tends to be true of the religious right in general.              For an example of the objectivity of Conservapedia, I submit their entry       for Unicorn:              The existence of unicorns is controversial. Secular opinion is that they       are mythical. However, they are referred to in the Bible nine times,[1]       which provides an unimpeachable de facto argument for their once having       been in existence.              In the original texts, unicorns go by the Hebrew name Re-em whereas the       Greek Septuagint used the name Monokeros.[2] Unicorn itself is Latin.       All three names mean "one horn".              While popularly characterized as a horned member of the horse baramin,       it is likely that the unicorn was actually quite unhorselike. One       recognized theory is that the unicorn was actually the rhinoceros,[1]       however a growing number of Creation researchers are theorizing that the       unicorn was actually a member of the ceratopsian baramin.[2]       Post-Noachian references[1] to unicorns have led some researchers to       argue that unicorns are still alive today. At the very least, it is       likely that they were taken aboard the Ark prior to the Great Flood.              References        1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 "The Identity of the Unicorn"        2. 2.0 2.1 "Dinosaurs in the Bible", Genesis Park              --       Support the troops: Bring them home ASAP.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca