XPost: az.general, az.politics   
   From: michelle@michelle.org   
      
   In article <1176301566.970441.3630@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,   
    dford3@gl.umbc.edu wrote:   
      
   > > > Do you agree with atheism-adherent Peter Singer that engaging in   
   > > > bestiality isn't immoral?   
   > >   
   > > No, because animals are incapable of informed consent.   
   >   
   > Do you think that engaging in bestiality is immoral?   
      
   Learn how to read for comprehension.  I already said that it is.   
      
   > Do you think a gestating human life is capable of giving "informed   
   > consent"?   
      
   It doesn't matter.  It's whether the pregnant woman gives informed   
   consent.   
      
   > > > > Do you agree with Christianists Paul Hill, Michael Griffin,   
   > > > > James Kopp, and Eric Rudolph that doctors should be murdered?   
   > >   
   > > > "Murdered" is a morally charged word-- IOW, the word "murdered"   
   > > > contains the moral claim of 'immorally killed.'   
   > >   
   > > "Murder" has a precise legal definition:  "1. Intending or knowing   
   > > that the person's conduct will cause death, the person causes the   
   > > death of another person... with premeditation or, as a result of   
   > > causing the death of another person with premeditation..."   
   > >   
   > > > I'll rephrase to get rid of the morally-charged word:   
   > > > "that doctors should be murdered?"   
   > > > becomes:   
   > > > 'that doctors should be killed?'   
   > >   
   > > Answer the question that I asked.   
   >   
   > Murder is immoral.  I oppose murder.   
      
   Answer the question.   
      
   > > > My response is:  which doctors?   
   > >   
   > > In this particular situation, doctors who perform abortions.   
      
   --   
   Support the troops:  Bring them home ASAP.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)