XPost: az.general, az.politics   
   From: michelle@michelle.org   
      
   In article <1176429172.985295.21160@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,   
    dford3@gl.umbc.edu wrote:   
      
   > > > Do you think the parents of Baby Knauer gave "informed consent"   
   > > > to the killing of Baby Knauer?   
   > >   
   > > That has nothing to do with abortion.  Please stick to the subject.   
   >   
   > You brought in the phrase "informed consent."  The questions below   
   > are intended to probe the consistency (or lack thereof) of your views   
   > regarding "informed consent."   
   >   
   > (Lurkers, perhaps it's the case that Michelle doesn't wish to examine   
   > her application of the concept of "informed consent" and see if it   
   > can withstand scrutiny.)   
      
   Rather, it is that you refuse to answer a simple yes-no question, to   
   wit: "Do you [df] agree with Christianists Paul Hill, Michael Griffin,   
   James Kopp, and Eric Rudolph that doctors should be murdered?"   
      
   Your question about Baby Knauer is a red herring, and has no bearing on   
   the subject.  If you wish to have an honest discussion, stop being so   
   disingenuous.   
      
   --   
   Support the troops:  Bring them home ASAP.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)