Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    phx.general    |    Pheonix general chat    |    3,579 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,252 of 3,579    |
|    Phxbrd to nospam"@cox.net    |
|    Re: Will Arizona State Government Shut D    |
|    01 Jul 09 15:33:17    |
      XPost: az.general, az.politics       From: lesliesethhammond@yahoo.com              "mrmcafee" <"(mrmcafee)nospam"@cox.net> wrote in message       news:N5Q2m.1002$Wx7.60@newsfe04.iad...       > Phxbrd wrote:       >> "mrmcafee" <"(mrmcafee)nospam"@cox.net> wrote in message       >> news:l1P2m.1958$8P7.1638@newsfe21.iad...       >>> Phxbrd wrote:       >>>> "mrmcafee" <"(mrmcafee)nospam"@cox.net> wrote in message       >>>> news:OyL2m.621$dd4.491@newsfe10.iad...       >>>>> Phxbrd wrote:       >>>>>>> Yeah, but you're nuts.       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>> What matters isn't what percentage you pay, it's how much you have       >>>>>>> left over after you pay. The pain burden needs to be equitable, not       >>>>>>> the actual tax burden. The top 10 percenters have PLENTY left over       >>>>>>> even if that pay up to 40% of their adjusted gross. That's not true       >>>>>>> for the other 90 percenters.       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>> Oh, those "loopholes" and deductions you complain about? They are a       >>>>>>> very effective tool of the government's to influence the economy.       >>>>>>> Like for example helping a new industry get established by offering       >>>>>>> people a tax credit for a portion of what they spend on it. Like for       >>>>>>> solar energy for example.       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>> But you claim to be a Libertarian, so we understand. You're just       >>>>>>> nuts, that's all.       >>>>>> "Flat tax" seems to involve a complexity that your so-called brain       >>>>>> can't encompass.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> I'll try to keep this as simple as I possibly can(dumb it down): A       >>>>>> simple flat tax might prove to be as low as, oh, let's say 5%. With       >>>>>> me so far? (That's 1% times 5).       >>>>> The legislature was proposing less than 3%. Just enough to keep the       >>>>> jails open and the cops on the road.       >>>>>       >>>>>       >>>>>> In practice, someone earning 100K per year would pay $5,000.00 in       >>>>>> flat tax. That leaves them the complement of $95,000.00 untaxed.       >>>>>> Get it? Now let's consider someone as poor-ass as you. If you       >>>>>> somehow managed to have gross earning of a whole 10K all by yourself,       >>>>>> you'd pay a measly $500.00. See how that works? Pay attention now       >>>>>> as I sum this up for you: Each of you will have paid the same       >>>>>> percentage of your income! Isn't that amazing? See how simple and       >>>>>> equitable a flat tax could be?       >>>>> Simple? Yes. Even you could figure your own tax. Whether or not you       >>>>> could address the envelope properly to get it to the DOR is another       >>>>> matter.       >>>>>       >>>>> The question is, will that $500.00 be missed more of less than the       >>>>> $5000.00 your upper middle class tax payer had to cough up? Will that       >>>>> $1,000,000.00 paid up by the wealthy developer in Paradise Valley be       >>>>> missed as much as the $500.00 will be? After all, the wealthy       >>>>> developer has $19,000,000 more with which to salve his wounds. The guy       >>>>> that paid $500.00 just has $9,500. That's not enough to live on       >>>>> properly. That $500.00 represents 2 months worth of beans and rice.       >>>>>       >>>>>       >>>>> (A       >>>>>> sliding scale of tax liability is built right in!)       >>>>> But it is not proportionate to the "value" of the taxes paid by each       >>>>> group. What has to be equitable isn't the tax amount paid, nor even       >>>>> the tax percentage but the tax "pain".       >>>>>       >>>>>       >>>>>> Now say this back to me to prove you understood the simple concept,       >>>>>> but if you can't, I'll understand...       >>>>> No one expects you to understand the progressive income tax theory.       >>>>> You're a Libertarian after all.       >>>> I give up. Your bumbling stupidity is too profound. I don't know how       >>>> you find your way out of bed in the morning.       >>>>       >>>> Ask the first person you see to explain the simple concept of "A       >>>> sliding scale of tax liability is built right in!".       >>>       >>> Ask the next billionaire you happen to meet if $500.00 is too much to       >>> pay for a good lunch.       >>>       >>       >> Point?       >>       >>       >>       >>       > |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca